On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:35:20PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes: > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > + > > + addr = intel_engine_get_active_head(engine); > > + seq_printf(m, "\tACTHD: 0x%08x_%08x\n", > > + upper_32_bits(addr), lower_32_bits(addr)); > > + addr = intel_engine_get_last_batch_head(engine); > > + seq_printf(m, "\tBBADDR: 0x%08x_%08x\n", > > + upper_32_bits(addr), lower_32_bits(addr)); > > + > > + if (i915.enable_execlists) { > > + u32 ptr, read, write; > > > > Ok, in here I am thinking that the requests in ports would be intresting > also. But it seems impossible to sample the ports without taking > locks. And we don't want to go there.
It's even worse than that. execlist_port[] are entirely unlocked and only updated by the sole owner. However... We can read them under the rcu guarantee that the requests themselves will not disappear (with the exception that the contents may be reallocated - but not explode!). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
