On pe, 2016-10-14 at 13:18 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > We want to hide the latency of releasing objects and their backing > storage from the submission, so we move the actual free to a worker. > This allows us to switch to struct_mutex freeing of the object in the > next patch. > > Furthermore, if we know that the object we are dereferencing remains valid > for the duration of our access, we can forgo the usual synchronisation > barriers and atomic reference counting. To ensure this we defer freeing > an object til after an RCU grace period, such that any lookup of the > object within an RCU read critical section will remain valid until > after we exit that critical section. We also employ this delay for > rate-limiting the serialisation on reallocation - we have to slow down > object creation in order to prevent resource starvation (in particular, > files). > > v2: Return early in i915_gem_tiling() ioctl to skip over superfluous > work on error. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With the change from John, Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
