On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:55:32AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2017, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jun 2017, Manasi Navare <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Validate the compliance test link parameters when the compliance
> >> test dpcd registers are read. Also validate them in compute_config
> >> before using them since the max values might have been reduced
> >> due to link training fallback.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
> >>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> index 832786d..cda0f0a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> @@ -1678,12 +1678,15 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder 
> >> *encoder,
> >>    if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> >>            int index;
> >>  
> >> -          index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> >> -                                      intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> >> -                                      
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> >> -          if (index >= 0)
> >> +          /* Validate the compliance test data */
> 
> Oh, and please do cite the reason for doing this again in the comment. I
> first read the code, didn't get it, until I read the commit message. :)
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
>

Thanks for the review. Will add this reason in the comment.
Will send a new revision with this change and checking index >=0.

Regards
Manasi

 
> 
> >> +          if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, 
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate,
> >> +                                         
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) {
> >> +                  index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> >> +                                              intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> >> +                                              
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> >
> > I think you still need to check index >= 0. intel_dp_link_params_valid
> > only checks the boundaries, not that the common rates actually contains
> > the value.
> >
> >>                    min_clock = max_clock = index;
> >> -          min_lane_count = max_lane_count = 
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> >> +                  min_lane_count = max_lane_count = 
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> >> +          }
> >>    }
> >>    DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
> >>                  "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
> >> @@ -3961,8 +3964,7 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, 
> >> u8 *sink_irq_vector)
> >>  static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >>  {
> >>    int status = 0;
> >> -  int min_lane_count = 1;
> >> -  int link_rate_index, test_link_rate;
> >> +  int test_link_rate;
> >>    uint8_t test_lane_count, test_link_bw;
> >>    /* (DP CTS 1.2)
> >>     * 4.3.1.11
> >> @@ -3976,10 +3978,6 @@ static uint8_t 
> >> intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >>            return DP_TEST_NAK;
> >>    }
> >>    test_lane_count &= DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT_MASK;
> >> -  /* Validate the requested lane count */
> >> -  if (test_lane_count < min_lane_count ||
> >> -      test_lane_count > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count)
> >> -          return DP_TEST_NAK;
> >>  
> >>    status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_LINK_RATE,
> >>                               &test_link_bw);
> >> @@ -3987,12 +3985,11 @@ static uint8_t 
> >> intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >>            DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Rate read failed\n");
> >>            return DP_TEST_NAK;
> >>    }
> >> -  /* Validate the requested link rate */
> >>    test_link_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(test_link_bw);
> >> -  link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> >> -                                        intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> >> -                                        test_link_rate);
> >> -  if (link_rate_index < 0)
> >> +
> >> +  /* Validate the requested link rate and lane count */
> >> +  if (!intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, test_link_rate,
> >> +                                  test_lane_count))
> >>            return DP_TEST_NAK;
> >
> > The changes here LGTM.
> >
> >>  
> >>    intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count = test_lane_count;
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to