tasklet_kill() will spin waiting for the current tasklet to be executed.
However, if tasklet_disable() has been called, then the tasklet is never
executed but permanently put back onto the runlist until
tasklet_enable() is called. Ergo, we cannot use tasklet_kill() inside a
disable/enable pair. This is the case when we call set-wedge from inside
i915_reset(), and another request was submitted to us concurrent to the

Fixes: 963ddd63c314 ("drm/i915: Suspend submission tasklets around wedging")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 3b44952e089f..e75af06904b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2941,7 +2941,8 @@ i915_gem_reset_prepare_engine(struct intel_engine_cs 
         * Turning off the execlists->tasklet until the reset is over
         * prevents the race.
-       tasklet_kill(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
+       if (!atomic_read(&engine->execlists.tasklet.count))
+               tasklet_kill(&engine->execlists.tasklet);

Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to