With a series of unusual events (a sequence of interrupted request
allocations), we could gradually leak the ring->space estimate by
unwinding the ring back to the start of the request, but not return the
used space back to the ring. Eventually and with great misfortune, it
would be possible to trigger ring->space exhaustion with no requests on
the ring.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index d437beac3969..efa9ee557f31 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ i915_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct
i915_gem_context *ctx)
err_unwind:
rq->ring->emit = rq->head;
+ intel_ring_update_space(rq->ring);
/* Make sure we didn't add ourselves to external state before freeing */
GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->active_list));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 1d599524a759..88eeb64041ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1593,6 +1593,7 @@ static noinline int wait_for_space(struct intel_ring
*ring, unsigned int bytes)
if (intel_ring_update_space(ring) >= bytes)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&ring->request_list));
list_for_each_entry(target, &ring->request_list, ring_link) {
/* Would completion of this request free enough space? */
if (bytes <= __intel_ring_space(target->postfix,
--
2.16.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
