Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-05-17 16:08:14) > > > On 17/05/18 01:23, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Confirm we have the available HW before asserting it succeeds. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > --- > > tests/gem_cpu_reloc.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/gem_cpu_reloc.c b/tests/gem_cpu_reloc.c > > index 882c312d4..e3bbcd239 100644 > > --- a/tests/gem_cpu_reloc.c > > +++ b/tests/gem_cpu_reloc.c > > @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ static void run_test(int fd, int count) > > use_blt = 0; > > Is this^ meant to be EXEC_DEFAULT?
Depends on your viewpoint. EXEC_DEFAULT is zero. > > if (intel_gen(noop) >= 6) > > use_blt = I915_EXEC_BLT; > > + gem_require_ring(fd, use_blt); > > Are any gens 6+ that do not have a BLT ring? if that is the case > shouldn't we use '0' like we do for 5- gens? No, it has to match the engine for which the blitter commands are valid. If that engine does not exist, there is no alternative except to rewrite the test not to use those commands. If there was, it indeed would be included in the selection above. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
