Do not treat reset as a normal preemption event and avoid giving the
guilty request a priority boost for simply being active at the time of
reset.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 01f58a152a9e..d7fc21535be2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -370,11 +370,11 @@ static void unwind_wa_tail(struct i915_request *rq)
 }
 
 static struct i915_request *
-__unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+__unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int boost)
 {
        struct i915_request *rq, *rn, *active = NULL;
        struct list_head *uninitialized_var(pl);
-       int prio = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID | ACTIVE_PRIORITY;
+       int prio = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID | boost;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
 
@@ -418,8 +418,9 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
         * in the priority queue, but they will not gain immediate access to
         * the GPU.
         */
-       if (~prio & ACTIVE_PRIORITY && __i915_request_has_started(active)) {
-               prio |= ACTIVE_PRIORITY;
+       if (~prio & boost && __i915_request_has_started(active)) {
+               prio |= boost;
+               GEM_BUG_ON(active->sched.attr.priority >= prio);
                active->sched.attr.priority = prio;
                list_move_tail(&active->sched.link,
                               i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio));
@@ -434,7 +435,7 @@ execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(struct 
intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
        struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
                container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
 
-       return __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
+       return __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine, 0);
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -655,7 +656,8 @@ static void complete_preempt_context(struct 
intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
        execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
        __unwind_incomplete_requests(container_of(execlists,
                                                  struct intel_engine_cs,
-                                                 execlists));
+                                                 execlists),
+                                    ACTIVE_PRIORITY);
 }
 
 static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -1908,7 +1910,7 @@ static void __execlists_reset(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine, bool stalled)
        execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
 
        /* Push back any incomplete requests for replay after the reset. */
-       rq = __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
+       rq = __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine, 0);
        if (!rq)
                goto out_replay;
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to