On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:51:20PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > If we go into suspend with unclaimed access detected, > it would be nice to catch that access on a next suspend path. > So instead of just notifying about it, arm the unclaimed > mmio checks on suspend side. > > We want to keep the asymmetry on resume, as if it was > on resume path, it was not driver that is responsible so > no point in arming mmio debugs. > > Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> I actually even like the extra DRM_ERROR here. Driver unload is another candidate for if (intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv)) DRM_ERROR("Unclaimed access detected prior to unload\n"); Might as well tickle the CI if nothing else. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
