On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:19:51PM +0300, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> 
> On VLV/CHV the master interrupt enable bit only affects GT/PM
> interrupts. Display interrupts are not affected by the master
> irq control.
> 
> Also it seems that the CPU interrupt will only be generated when
> the combined result of all GT/PM/display interrupts has a 0->1
> edge. We already use the master interrupt enable bit to make sure
> GT/PM interrupt can generate such an edge if we don't end up clearing
> all IIR bits. We must do the same for display interrupts, and for
> that we can simply clear out VLV_IER, and restore after we've acked
> all the interrupts we are about to process.
> 
> So with both master interrupt enable and VLV_IER cleared out, we will
> guarantee that there will be a 0->1 edge if any IIR bits are still set
> at the end, and thus another CPU interrupt will be generated.
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 579de73b048a ("drm/i915: Exit cherryview_irq_handler() after one pass")
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 626775039919..46be03c616f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static irqreturn_t valleyview_irq_handler(int irq, void 
> *arg)
>       disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
>  
>       while (true) {
> -             /* Find, clear, then process each source of interrupt */
> +             u32 ier = 0;
>  
>               gt_iir = I915_READ(GTIIR);
>               pm_iir = I915_READ(GEN6_PMIIR);
> @@ -1789,7 +1789,22 @@ static irqreturn_t valleyview_irq_handler(int irq, 
> void *arg)
>  
>               ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>  
> +             /*
> +              * Theory on interrupt generation, based on empirical evidence:
> +              *
> +              * x = ((VLV_IIR & VLV_IER) ||
> +              *      (((GT_IIR & GT_IER) || (GEN6_PMIIR & GEN6_PMIER)) &&
> +              *       (VLV_MASTER_IER & MASTER_INTERRUPT_ENABLE)));
> +              *
> +              * A CPU interrupt will only be raised when 'x' has a 0->1 edge.
> +              * Hence we clear MASTER_INTERRUPT_ENABLE and VLV_IER to
> +              * guarantee the CPU interrupt will be raised again even if we
> +              * don't end up clearing all the VLV_IIR, GT_IIR, GEN6_PMIIR
> +              * bits this time around.

Following this logic, we want to enable MASTER_IER before VLV_IER such
that we get an immediate irq if there is a residual VLV_IIR.

> +              */
>               I915_WRITE(VLV_MASTER_IER, 0);
> +             ier = I915_READ(VLV_IER);

+wishlist: dev_priv->irq_enabled to save adding another mmio read.

> +             I915_WRITE(VLV_IER, 0);
>  
>               if (gt_iir)
>                       I915_WRITE(GTIIR, gt_iir);
> @@ -1815,6 +1830,7 @@ static irqreturn_t valleyview_irq_handler(int irq, void 
> *arg)
>               if (iir)
>                       I915_WRITE(VLV_IIR, iir);
>  
> +             I915_WRITE(VLV_IER, ier);
>               I915_WRITE(VLV_MASTER_IER, MASTER_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
>               POSTING_READ(VLV_MASTER_IER);
>       }
> 

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to