By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 8658c02e92f1..d64c393bf42c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5418,7 +5418,9 @@ static void bxt_de_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv)
        I915_WRITE(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, 0);
 
        /* Timeout 200us */
-       if (wait_for((I915_READ(BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE) & BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK) == 0, 1))
+       if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+                                   BXT_DE_PLL_ENABLE, BXT_DE_PLL_LOCK, 0,
+                                   1))
                DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for DE PLL unlock\n");
 
        dev_priv->cdclk_pll.vco = 0;
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to