By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index f1a817ed134d..0757ee427ad7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3322,8 +3322,10 @@ void intel_dp_set_idle_link_train(struct intel_dp 
*intel_dp)
        if (port == PORT_A)
                return;
 
-       if (wait_for((I915_READ(DP_TP_STATUS(port)) & DP_TP_STATUS_IDLE_DONE),
-                    1))
+       if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,DP_TP_STATUS(port),
+                                   DP_TP_STATUS_IDLE_DONE,
+                                   DP_TP_STATUS_IDLE_DONE,
+                                   1))
                DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for DP idle patterns\n");
 }
 
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to