By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
index 97893457ddb8..7dea3c382892 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
@@ -206,8 +206,9 @@ u32 intel_sbi_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 
reg,
        u32 value = 0;
        WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->sb_lock));
 
-       if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & SBI_BUSY) == 0,
-                               100)) {
+       if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+                                   SBI_CTL_STAT, SBI_BUSY, 0,
+                                   100)) {
                DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to become ready\n");
                return 0;
        }
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to