By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index fc0794de595b..1be0c02f5b4d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1820,7 +1820,9 @@ void vlv_wait_port_ready(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv,
                BUG();
        }
 
-       if (wait_for((I915_READ(dpll_reg) & port_mask) == expected_mask, 1000))
+       if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+                                   dpll_reg, port_mask, expected_mask,
+                                   1000))
                WARN(1, "timed out waiting for port %c ready: got 0x%x, 
expected 0x%x\n",
                     port_name(dport->port), I915_READ(dpll_reg) & port_mask, 
expected_mask);
 }
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to