On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:20:00PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > In an effort to simplify things for a future push of dev_priv instead > of dev wherever possible, always take pdev via dev_priv where > feasible, eliminating the direct access from dev. Right now this > only eliminates a few cases of dev, but it also obviates that we pass > dev into a lot of functions where dev_priv would be the more obvious > choice. > > Signed-off-by: David Weinehall <david.weineh...@linux.intel.com>
struct pci_dev *pdev improves consistency and pdev tends to be used frequently within functions, so Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
