Em Sex, 2016-09-09 às 13:30 +0530, Kumar, Mahesh escreveu:
> From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
>
> This patch make changes to use linetime latency instead of allocated
> DDB size during plane watermark calculation in switch case, This is
> required to implement new DDB allocation algorithm.
>
> In New Algorithm DDB is allocated based on WM values, because of
> which
> number of DDB blocks will not be available during WM calculation,
> So this "linetime latency" is suggested by SV/HW team to use during
> switch-case for WM blocks selection.
Why is this not part of BSpec? If there's some problem with the current
algorithm and we need a new one, why is it not part of our spec?
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Rebase on top of Paulo's patch series
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 3fdec4d..cfd9b7d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3622,10 +3622,15 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> selected_result = max(method2, y_tile_minimum);
> } else {
> + uint32_t linetime_us = 0;
> +
> + linetime_us = DIV_ROUND_UP(width * 1000,
> + skl_pipe_pixel_rate(cstate));
> +
> if ((cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal /
> 512 < 1) &&
> (plane_bytes_per_line / 512 < 1))
> selected_result = method2;
> - else if ((ddb_allocation / plane_blocks_per_line) >=
> 1)
> + if (latency >= linetime_us)
> selected_result = min(method1, method2);
> else
> selected_result = method1;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
