I wanna unsolder the graphics chip on my motherboard off and replace it with an nvidia one....
Can't really say jk but yea may as well be happy now that I can play source games now with modded drivers :) On Nov 11, 11:13 am, Baddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah right ..... > nvidia and ati have way better integrated graphics.... > intel fooled us... of course we deserve much better .. > but arent you happy enough that some games work now that dint work > before???.... > of course credit goes to the guys who modded the driver.... > > On Nov 11, 7:12 pm, "micah taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It might be able to do that, but other integrated graphics chips have been > > able to do everything a million times better. especially nvidia integrated. > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Baddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > cos it is!!! > > > i accept that its crappier than other onboards.... > > > still it can run almost 75% of shader 2.0 games(with modded drivers of > > > course) without a problem.... > > > so... overall from the price-to-perfomance point of view it > > > rocks!!!.... > > > i dint spend a bit of extra money to play all the games that werent > > > supposed to work.... > > > so its a good solution right??!!!! > > > > On Nov 11, 6:53 pm, "micah taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > wait... why is it a good onboard solution overall? > > > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Baddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This is just a copy paste from my conclusons on gma 950 hope you guys > > > > > like it.... > > > > > here it is: > > > > > > These are my conclusions on gma 950:- > > > > > > 1.Mainly there is no hardware vertex shader on gma 950. > > > > > 2.since hardware tnl is done on hardware vertex shaders(in the case of > > > > > intel igp's only)so no harware tnl. > > > > > 3.vertex shader 2.0 and 2.0a are emulated because of the registry > > > > > switch and they are processed by the cpu(resulting in very poor > > > > > perfomance) > > > > > 4.it has only hardware pixel shader 2.0 which is fast.thats why games > > > > > like f.e.a.r work because they rely on pixel shading abilities only. > > > > > 5.Volumetric effects(property of a normal shader 2.0 card) is absent > > > > > and thats why crysis water looks horrible on gma 950 whereas even > > > > > swiftshader can produce that water well... thats a drawback. > > > > > 6.overall, i can say that gma 950 is a great onboard solution inspite > > > > > of all the drawbacks that i mentioned and i am proud to have it. > > > > > > And i am going to buy a 9600 gt(due to desperation) .... so i d like > > > > > to exhibit my findings on gma 950 which may be useful for > > > > > others .....thanks in advance.... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "INTEL 9XX Gaming" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gaming?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
