hmm, if that's the case, it ran faster juz from less memory usage for the os itself....although win2000 does a terrible job in multitasking..and im not sure if it taking advantage of multicore CPU...which is kinda important for today's system..
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote: > lol. > > But anyway yea 2000 is built on NT as someone said above and its > comparable to XP. > > Very outdated though, internet explorer is stuck at 5, and windows > update won't even work (for me anyway, im 90% sure the copy I have > passes WGA too) > > WoW runs at very similar speed though, if not a tiny bit faster. > > On 1/19/10, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > obviously intel have done a terrible job on providing us with a good > > driver.... > > i wonder if the driver for the CPU are good enough, soon they will be a > MD > > for intel CPU...lol..jk jk/// > > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Oscar Lundqvist > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Yes they are, built on the same system. But the drivers might differ a > >> bit, > >> and obviously intel made a mistake with a driver.. again, how surprising > >> :P > >> > >> -- > >> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >
-- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
