i can't remember when was the last time i have heard "Windows 2000, or NT" loool, just a question though, how do u get that list of "text" like Espi and Neo?
On Jan 21, 1:20 pm, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's mine from Windows 7 x64 > > -- > > 1/20 22:19:22.422 CGxDevice::DeviceAdapterID(): RET: 1, VID: 8086, > DID: 2a02, DVER: 0.0 > 1/20 22:19:22.447 CGxDevice::DeviceAdapterInfer(): RET: 1, DID: 3 > 1/20 22:19:22.447 ConsoleDetectDetectHardware(): > 1/20 22:19:22.447 cpuIdx: 1 > 1/20 22:19:22.447 videoID: 693 > 1/20 22:19:22.447 soundIdx: 0 > 1/20 22:19:22.447 memIdx: 0 > 1/20 22:19:22.524 ConsoleDeviceInitialize(): hwDetect = 1, hwChanged > = 0 > 1/20 22:19:22.591 CGxDeviceD3d::DeviceSetFormat(): > 1/20 22:19:22.591 Format 1024 x 768 @ 60 Fullscreen, ArgbX888, > Ds24X, multisample 1 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 Caps: > 1/20 22:19:23.840 numTmus: 8 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 generateMipMaps: 1 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 texFilterAnisotropic: 1, 16 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 rttFormat: 1, 1 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 pixelShaderTarget: ps_3_0 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 vertexShaderTarget: vs_3_0 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 vertexShaderConstants: 256 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 numStreams: 16 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 stereoAvailable: 0 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 NVAPI: 0 > 1/20 22:19:23.840 stereoHandle: 0 > > On Jan 19, 6:53 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hmm, if that's the case, it ran faster juz from less memory usage for the os > > itself....although win2000 does a terrible job in multitasking..and im not > > sure if it taking advantage of multicore CPU...which is kinda important for > > today's system.. > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > lol. > > > > But anyway yea 2000 is built on NT as someone said above and its > > > comparable to XP. > > > > Very outdated though, internet explorer is stuck at 5, and windows > > > update won't even work (for me anyway, im 90% sure the copy I have > > > passes WGA too) > > > > WoW runs at very similar speed though, if not a tiny bit faster. > > > > On 1/19/10, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > obviously intel have done a terrible job on providing us with a good > > > > driver.... > > > > i wonder if the driver for the CPU are good enough, soon they will be a > > > MD > > > > for intel CPU...lol..jk jk/// > > > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Oscar Lundqvist > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> Yes they are, built on the same system. But the drivers might differ a > > > >> bit, > > > >> and obviously intel made a mistake with a driver.. again, how > > > >> surprising > > > >> :P > > > > >> -- > > > >> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > -- > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > >
-- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
