well, i never try WoW, but does the Warcraft3 and WoW uses the same engine?? i played W3 and it was fast compare to when i play it in XP..or at least the same..
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote: > Hmm, I like Windows 7, but XP performs better with a few games that I > play. > > World of Warcraft > XP: 20-30FPS (Almost highest detail) > 7: 10-15FPS (All lowest) (software vertex) > 7: 10-20FPS (all lowest) (hardware vertex) > > Idk what it is exactly, but for some reason WoW goes downhill on any > OS above XP. Its the only thing also. I'll probably switch back to 7 > and see if I can try some more things out though. > > The strange thing is though, that XP looks like it uses more memory > then 7. > > XP: Total Physical Memory - Avaliable = Usage (2087020 - 1453497 = > 633523) 618MB > 7: Around 490MB to 520MB > > And WoW's performance still suffers no matter what I seem to do to the > OS itself (disable services, use Classic look vs Aero) > > So, anyone happen to understand why? If I could just get that game > working, then I wouldn't have a real reason to use XP. But when I play > WoW, it has to have somewhat decent graphics and FPS > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
