Hmm, idk if it uses the same engine exactly but for some reason my war3 is slower on 7 then XP.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:54 PM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > well, i never try WoW, but does the Warcraft3 and WoW uses the same engine?? > i played W3 and it was fast compare to when i play it in XP..or at least the > same.. > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hmm, I like Windows 7, but XP performs better with a few games that I >> play. >> >> World of Warcraft >> XP: 20-30FPS (Almost highest detail) >> 7: 10-15FPS (All lowest) (software vertex) >> 7: 10-20FPS (all lowest) (hardware vertex) >> >> Idk what it is exactly, but for some reason WoW goes downhill on any >> OS above XP. Its the only thing also. I'll probably switch back to 7 >> and see if I can try some more things out though. >> >> The strange thing is though, that XP looks like it uses more memory >> then 7. >> >> XP: Total Physical Memory - Avaliable = Usage (2087020 - 1453497 = >> 633523) 618MB >> 7: Around 490MB to 520MB >> >> And WoW's performance still suffers no matter what I seem to do to the >> OS itself (disable services, use Classic look vs Aero) >> >> So, anyone happen to understand why? If I could just get that game >> working, then I wouldn't have a real reason to use XP. But when I play >> WoW, it has to have somewhat decent graphics and FPS >> >> -- >> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
