hmm, im gonna look for this issue, coz im afraid my W3 are fine in terms of performance...and i dont enable software vertex with W3..
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote: > Hmm, idk if it uses the same engine exactly but for some reason my > war3 is slower on 7 then XP. > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:54 PM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > well, i never try WoW, but does the Warcraft3 and WoW uses the same > engine?? > > i played W3 and it was fast compare to when i play it in XP..or at least > the > > same.. > > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hmm, I like Windows 7, but XP performs better with a few games that I > >> play. > >> > >> World of Warcraft > >> XP: 20-30FPS (Almost highest detail) > >> 7: 10-15FPS (All lowest) (software vertex) > >> 7: 10-20FPS (all lowest) (hardware vertex) > >> > >> Idk what it is exactly, but for some reason WoW goes downhill on any > >> OS above XP. Its the only thing also. I'll probably switch back to 7 > >> and see if I can try some more things out though. > >> > >> The strange thing is though, that XP looks like it uses more memory > >> then 7. > >> > >> XP: Total Physical Memory - Avaliable = Usage (2087020 - 1453497 = > >> 633523) 618MB > >> 7: Around 490MB to 520MB > >> > >> And WoW's performance still suffers no matter what I seem to do to the > >> OS itself (disable services, use Classic look vs Aero) > >> > >> So, anyone happen to understand why? If I could just get that game > >> working, then I wouldn't have a real reason to use XP. But when I play > >> WoW, it has to have somewhat decent graphics and FPS > >> > >> -- > >> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
