I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but your chipset resembles more > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general chip. I think you can't > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock is, at least at default, at > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent desktop chipset but you > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock speeds. > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even 100% trust it seeing as it >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you have a 940gml chipset, which has >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for core duos and the likes. I think >> > the only limitations you have are the fsbs of cpus, the maximum amount >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at 166mhz instead of 250, which >> > explains your gaming performance. >> >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I guess? Which I guess in turn would >> >> mean lower transfer rate between devices? But I'm pretty sure my 945gm >> >> is the same as anyone else who has a 945gm >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:35 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > You sure? So it means you have a lesser gma 950? >> >> >> > On Jun 15, 7:30 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> 945GM for graphics, i940 for chipset >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:28 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > I think the increase of the processor will be felt more or less >> >> >> > easily, and the increase in graphics just might make your whole aero >> >> >> > experience less jerky. You have a 945gm/gms/gme or a 940/943gml? >> >> >> >> > On Jun 15, 2:10 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Ok heres my new results: >> >> >> >> >> Windows 7 MD v1.1 >> >> >> >> Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz (original clock) >> >> >> >> 2GB 222Mhz DDR2 >> >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.1 >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.5 >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.0 >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.0 >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.3 >> >> >> >> >> Same machine only with PCI/PCI-E/DDR frequency jacked up to max, and >> >> >> >> CPU clock at 1.9Ghz (via SetFSB) >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.6 (slightly boosted) >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.7 (slightly boosted) >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.9 (significiant boost) >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.1 (slightly boosted) >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.4 (slightly boosted) >> >> >> >> >> So maybe the CPU does make the difference. Idk if I'm that convinced >> >> >> >> though since gaming graphics barely moved.... >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 3, 9:37 am, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > Intel Pentium 4 2.4 gHz >> >> >> >> > Intel G945 Integrated 256 MB graphics >> >> >> >> > 1 GB RAM >> >> >> >> > Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit >> >> >> >> >> > CPU 5.8 >> >> >> >> > RAM 5.2 >> >> >> >> > Graphics 4.0 >> >> >> >> > Gaming Graphics: 3.9 >> >> >> >> >> > Yes, Gaming graphics and Processor speed is related. If either is >> >> >> >> > lower, the >> >> >> >> > second will be low too. >> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:51 PM, DanielPK >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > > CPU: 4.4 >> >> >> >> > > RAM: 5.2 >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.1 >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.2 >> >> >> >> > > HDD: 5.8 >> >> >> >> >> > > Base Score: 3.1 :( >> >> >> >> > > 3.1MAX (with alpha drivers) the above CPU score is with (Core >> >> >> >> > > Duo >> >> >> >> > > T2300E) ...with the C2D my CPU score is actually 5.6 with a >> >> >> >> > > sucky GPU >> >> >> >> > > hahahahaha... >> >> >> >> >> > > On Jun 3, 4:00 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > maybe GMA scores are CPU related....i pretty much have the >> >> >> >> > > > same scores as >> >> >> >> > > > tribaljet..dual core related maybe? >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:07 PM, tribaljet >> >> >> >> > > > <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > > Forgot to say that I updated my bios which was supposed to >> >> >> >> > > > > fix some >> >> >> >> > > > > minor bugs with hardware, but who knows if it increased >> >> >> >> > > > > speed somehow. >> >> >> >> > > > > Along with a few newer chipset drivers, I think that might >> >> >> >> > > > > have just >> >> >> >> > > > > done the trick, perhaps. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > On Jun 3, 4:13 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > > > I don't get how your Graphics is that much higher then >> >> >> >> > > > > > mine lol. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, tribaljet >> >> >> >> > > > > > <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > > > > OS: Windows 7 x86 >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU: Intel Core Duo T2600 >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics: GMA950 >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Driver: Sigma 3.1 >> >> >> >> > > > > > > ----------------- >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics - 3.5 >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Gaming Graphics - 3.2 >> >> >> >> > > > > > > RAM - 4.9 >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU - 4.8 >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > -- >> >> >> >> > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- >> >> >> >> > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- >> >> >> >> > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >> >> >> > > -- >> >> >> >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> >> > -- >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> >> -- >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > -- >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> -- >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >
-- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
