hmm, pardon me if it's off topic but what chipset that most netbooks use?? i think i know how to make V1.1 fully compatible with netbooks....
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > So, between 166mhz (the power saving mode and default for some > chipsets), 250 (the mobile default) and 400 (desktop default), if you > have 400 is great, making the fsb the only limiting factor in your > graphic performance. > > On Jun 15, 8:56 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but your chipset resembles more > > > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general chip. I think you can't > > > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock is, at least at default, at > > > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent desktop chipset but you > > > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock speeds. > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even 100% trust it seeing as it > > >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you have a 940gml chipset, which > has > > >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for core duos and the likes. I > think > > >> > the only limitations you have are the fsbs of cpus, the maximum > amount > > >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at 166mhz instead of 250, which > > >> > explains your gaming performance. > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I guess? Which I guess in turn > would > > >> >> mean lower transfer rate between devices? But I'm pretty sure my > 945gm > > >> >> is the same as anyone else who has a 945gm > > > > >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:35 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> >> > You sure? So it means you have a lesser gma 950? > > > > >> >> > On Jun 15, 7:30 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >> 945GM for graphics, i940 for chipset > > > > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:28 AM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >> > I think the increase of the processor will be felt more or > less > > >> >> >> > easily, and the increase in graphics just might make your > whole aero > > >> >> >> > experience less jerky. You have a 945gm/gms/gme or a > 940/943gml? > > > > >> >> >> > On Jun 15, 2:10 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> Ok heres my new results: > > > > >> >> >> >> Windows 7 MD v1.1 > > >> >> >> >> Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz (original clock) > > >> >> >> >> 2GB 222Mhz DDR2 > > > > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.1 > > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.5 > > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.0 > > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.0 > > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.3 > > > > >> >> >> >> Same machine only with PCI/PCI-E/DDR frequency jacked up to > max, and > > >> >> >> >> CPU clock at 1.9Ghz (via SetFSB) > > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.6 (slightly boosted) > > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.7 (slightly boosted) > > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.9 (significiant boost) > > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.1 (slightly boosted) > > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.4 (slightly boosted) > > > > >> >> >> >> So maybe the CPU does make the difference. Idk if I'm that > convinced > > >> >> >> >> though since gaming graphics barely moved.... > > > > >> >> >> >> On Jun 3, 9:37 am, Abhishek Indoria < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> > Intel Pentium 4 2.4 gHz > > >> >> >> >> > Intel G945 Integrated 256 MB graphics > > >> >> >> >> > 1 GB RAM > > >> >> >> >> > Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit > > > > >> >> >> >> > CPU 5.8 > > >> >> >> >> > RAM 5.2 > > >> >> >> >> > Graphics 4.0 > > >> >> >> >> > Gaming Graphics: 3.9 > > > > >> >> >> >> > Yes, Gaming graphics and Processor speed is related. If > either is lower, the > > >> >> >> >> > second will be low too. > > > > >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:51 PM, DanielPK < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> > > CPU: 4.4 > > >> >> >> >> > > RAM: 5.2 > > >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.1 > > >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.2 > > >> >> >> >> > > HDD: 5.8 > > > > >> >> >> >> > > Base Score: 3.1 :( > > >> >> >> >> > > 3.1MAX (with alpha drivers) the above CPU score is with > (Core Duo > > >> >> >> >> > > T2300E) ...with the C2D my CPU score is actually 5.6 with > a sucky GPU > > >> >> >> >> > > hahahahaha... > > > > >> >> >> >> > > On Jun 3, 4:00 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > > > maybe GMA scores are CPU related....i pretty much have > the same scores as > > >> >> >> >> > > > tribaljet..dual core related maybe? > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:07 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> > > >> >> >> >> > > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > > > > Forgot to say that I updated my bios which was > supposed to fix some > > >> >> >> >> > > > > minor bugs with hardware, but who knows if it > increased speed somehow. > > >> >> >> >> > > > > Along with a few newer chipset drivers, I think that > might have just > > >> >> >> >> > > > > done the trick, perhaps. > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > On Jun 3, 4:13 am, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > I don't get how your Graphics is that much higher > then mine lol. > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> > > >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > OS: Windows 7 x86 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU: Intel Core Duo T2600 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics: GMA950 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Driver: Sigma 3.1 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > ----------------- > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics - 3.5 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Gaming Graphics - 3.2 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > RAM - 4.9 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU - 4.8 > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > -- > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > > >> >> >> >> > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >> >> >> > > -- > > >> >> >> >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> > -- > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >> >> -- > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > >> > -- > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > >> -- > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
