So, between 166mhz (the power saving mode and default for some chipsets), 250 (the mobile default) and 400 (desktop default), if you have 400 is great, making the fsb the only limiting factor in your graphic performance.
On Jun 15, 8:56 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but your chipset resembles more > > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general chip. I think you can't > > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock is, at least at default, at > > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent desktop chipset but you > > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock speeds. > > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even 100% trust it seeing as it > >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you have a 940gml chipset, which has > >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for core duos and the likes. I think > >> > the only limitations you have are the fsbs of cpus, the maximum amount > >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at 166mhz instead of 250, which > >> > explains your gaming performance. > > >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I guess? Which I guess in turn would > >> >> mean lower transfer rate between devices? But I'm pretty sure my 945gm > >> >> is the same as anyone else who has a 945gm > > >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:35 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > You sure? So it means you have a lesser gma 950? > > >> >> > On Jun 15, 7:30 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> 945GM for graphics, i940 for chipset > > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:28 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > I think the increase of the processor will be felt more or less > >> >> >> > easily, and the increase in graphics just might make your whole > >> >> >> > aero > >> >> >> > experience less jerky. You have a 945gm/gms/gme or a 940/943gml? > > >> >> >> > On Jun 15, 2:10 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> Ok heres my new results: > > >> >> >> >> Windows 7 MD v1.1 > >> >> >> >> Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz (original clock) > >> >> >> >> 2GB 222Mhz DDR2 > > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.1 > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.5 > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.0 > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.0 > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.3 > > >> >> >> >> Same machine only with PCI/PCI-E/DDR frequency jacked up to max, > >> >> >> >> and > >> >> >> >> CPU clock at 1.9Ghz (via SetFSB) > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.6 (slightly boosted) > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.7 (slightly boosted) > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.9 (significiant boost) > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.1 (slightly boosted) > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.4 (slightly boosted) > > >> >> >> >> So maybe the CPU does make the difference. Idk if I'm that > >> >> >> >> convinced > >> >> >> >> though since gaming graphics barely moved.... > > >> >> >> >> On Jun 3, 9:37 am, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > Intel Pentium 4 2.4 gHz > >> >> >> >> > Intel G945 Integrated 256 MB graphics > >> >> >> >> > 1 GB RAM > >> >> >> >> > Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit > > >> >> >> >> > CPU 5.8 > >> >> >> >> > RAM 5.2 > >> >> >> >> > Graphics 4.0 > >> >> >> >> > Gaming Graphics: 3.9 > > >> >> >> >> > Yes, Gaming graphics and Processor speed is related. If either > >> >> >> >> > is lower, the > >> >> >> >> > second will be low too. > > >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:51 PM, DanielPK > >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > > CPU: 4.4 > >> >> >> >> > > RAM: 5.2 > >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.1 > >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.2 > >> >> >> >> > > HDD: 5.8 > > >> >> >> >> > > Base Score: 3.1 :( > >> >> >> >> > > 3.1MAX (with alpha drivers) the above CPU score is with > >> >> >> >> > > (Core Duo > >> >> >> >> > > T2300E) ...with the C2D my CPU score is actually 5.6 with a > >> >> >> >> > > sucky GPU > >> >> >> >> > > hahahahaha... > > >> >> >> >> > > On Jun 3, 4:00 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > > maybe GMA scores are CPU related....i pretty much have the > >> >> >> >> > > > same scores as > >> >> >> >> > > > tribaljet..dual core related maybe? > > >> >> >> >> > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:07 PM, tribaljet > >> >> >> >> > > > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > > > Forgot to say that I updated my bios which was supposed > >> >> >> >> > > > > to fix some > >> >> >> >> > > > > minor bugs with hardware, but who knows if it increased > >> >> >> >> > > > > speed somehow. > >> >> >> >> > > > > Along with a few newer chipset drivers, I think that > >> >> >> >> > > > > might have just > >> >> >> >> > > > > done the trick, perhaps. > > >> >> >> >> > > > > On Jun 3, 4:13 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > > > > I don't get how your Graphics is that much higher then > >> >> >> >> > > > > > mine lol. > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, tribaljet > >> >> >> >> > > > > > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > OS: Windows 7 x86 > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU: Intel Core Duo T2600 > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics: GMA950 > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Driver: Sigma 3.1 > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > ----------------- > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics - 3.5 > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Gaming Graphics - 3.2 > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > RAM - 4.9 > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU - 4.8 > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > -- > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- > >> >> >> >> > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > >> >> >> >> > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >> >> >> > > -- > >> >> >> >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text - > > >> >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> >> -- > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > >> > -- > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> -- > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
