What makes a netbook a netbook? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:44 AM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > well, im not saying that it's like installing a full driver...it's like a > patch to an already installed driver... > im planning an upgrade coz V1.1 is pretty old now, and V1.2 is under early > stage of development... > some that u can expect from the update is... > - fully working with netbooks, which apparently most netbook users wanted it > back then... > - some minor bug fixed such as MSI code which make PCI slows down such as in > ur case... > - and some major bug regarding performance.. > i had to handed to u tribaljet..^^ without ur report on the V1.1 not long > ago, i never knew what the bugs are, finally now V1.1 will be renew > again...^^ i might released it next week for testers... > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:35 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So you're saying those who have V1.1 installed should install this new >> version? And what kind of improvements might we expect? I personally >> ask because you know I've had my share of problems regarding driver >> installs, which after your help were solved and now things work better >> than ever. >> >> On Jun 15, 9:29 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > ah, maybe pretty soon i wanna make an update on V1.1...full improvements >> > coming soon for V1.1 users ^^ >> > while waiting for the V1.2, V1.1 can enjoy an upgrade...V1.1E... >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:26 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > It seems the majority of netbooks use 945gse, but a few also use the >> > > same as mine, 945gme with the device id 27ae. >> > >> > > On Jun 15, 9:21 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > hmm, pardon me if it's off topic but what chipset that most netbooks >> > > use?? >> > > > i think i know how to make V1.1 fully compatible with netbooks.... >> > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > So, between 166mhz (the power saving mode and default for some >> > > > > chipsets), 250 (the mobile default) and 400 (desktop default), if >> > > > > you >> > > > > have 400 is great, making the fsb the only limiting factor in your >> > > > > graphic performance. >> > >> > > > > On Jun 15, 8:56 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz >> > >> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet >> > > > > > <[email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but your chipset resembles >> > > > > > > more >> > > > > > > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general chip. I think you >> > > > > > > can't >> > > > > > > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock is, at least at >> > > > > > > default, >> > > at >> > > > > > > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent desktop chipset but >> > > > > > > you >> > > > > > > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock speeds. >> > >> > > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even 100% trust it seeing as >> > > > > > >> it >> > > > > > >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. >> > >> > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet >> > > > > > >> <[email protected] >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you have a 940gml >> > > > > > >> > chipset, >> > > which >> > > > > has >> > > > > > >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for core duos and the >> > > > > > >> > likes. I >> > > > > think >> > > > > > >> > the only limitations you have are the fsbs of cpus, the >> > > > > > >> > maximum >> > > > > amount >> > > > > > >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at 166mhz instead of 250, >> > > > > > >> > which >> > > > > > >> > explains your gaming performance. >> > >> > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I guess? Which I guess >> > > > > > >> >> in >> > > turn >> > > > > would >> > > > > > >> >> mean lower transfer rate between devices? But I'm pretty >> > > > > > >> >> sure >> > > my >> > > > > 945gm >> > > > > > >> >> is the same as anyone else who has a 945gm >> > >> > > > > > >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:35 AM, tribaljet < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > You sure? So it means you have a lesser gma 950? >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > On Jun 15, 7:30 am, Espionage724 >> > > > > > >> >> > <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> 945GM for graphics, i940 for chipset >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:28 AM, tribaljet < >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> > I think the increase of the processor will be felt >> > > > > > >> >> >> > more or >> > > > > less >> > > > > > >> >> >> > easily, and the increase in graphics just might make >> > > > > > >> >> >> > your >> > > > > whole aero >> > > > > > >> >> >> > experience less jerky. You have a 945gm/gms/gme or a >> > > > > 940/943gml? >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > On Jun 15, 2:10 am, Espionage724 >> > > > > > >> >> >> > <[email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Ok heres my new results: >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Windows 7 MD v1.1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz (original clock) >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> 2GB 222Mhz DDR2 >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.5 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.3 >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Same machine only with PCI/PCI-E/DDR frequency >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> jacked up >> > > to >> > > > > max, and >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> CPU clock at 1.9Ghz (via SetFSB) >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.6 (slightly boosted) >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.7 (slightly boosted) >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.9 (significiant boost) >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.1 (slightly boosted) >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.4 (slightly boosted) >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> So maybe the CPU does make the difference. Idk if >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> I'm >> > > that >> > > > > convinced >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> though since gaming graphics barely moved.... >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> On Jun 3, 9:37 am, Abhishek Indoria < >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Intel Pentium 4 2.4 gHz >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Intel G945 Integrated 256 MB graphics >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > 1 GB RAM >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > CPU 5.8 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > RAM 5.2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Graphics 4.0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Gaming Graphics: 3.9 >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > Yes, Gaming graphics and Processor speed is >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > related. If >> > > > > either is lower, the >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > second will be low too. >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:51 PM, DanielPK < >> > > > > [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > CPU: 4.4 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > RAM: 5.2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > GC: 3.2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > HDD: 5.8 >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > Base Score: 3.1 :( >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > 3.1MAX (with alpha drivers) the above CPU score >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > is >> > > with >> > > > > (Core Duo >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > T2300E) ...with the C2D my CPU score is actually >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > 5.6 >> > > with >> > > > > a sucky GPU >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > hahahahaha... >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > On Jun 3, 4:00 pm, AngelicTears >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > <[email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > maybe GMA scores are CPU related....i pretty >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > much >> > > have >> > > > > the same scores as >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > tribaljet..dual core related maybe? >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:07 PM, tribaljet < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > Forgot to say that I updated my bios which >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > was >> > > > > supposed to fix some >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > minor bugs with hardware, but who knows if >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > it >> > > > > increased speed somehow. >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > Along with a few newer chipset drivers, I >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > think >> > > that >> > > > > might have just >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > done the trick, perhaps. >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > On Jun 3, 4:13 am, Espionage724 < >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > I don't get how your Graphics is that much >> > > higher >> > > > > then mine lol. >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, tribaljet >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > OS: Windows 7 x86 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU: Intel Core Duo T2600 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics: GMA950 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Driver: Sigma 3.1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > ----------------- >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Graphics - 3.5 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Gaming Graphics - 3.2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > RAM - 4.9 >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > CPU - 4.8 >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > -- >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > -- >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > -- >> > > > > > >> >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> -- >> > > > > > >> >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > -- >> > > > > > >> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > > > >> >> -- >> > > > > > >> >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> > >> > > > > > >> > -- >> > > > > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > > > >> -- >> > > > > > >> Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > -- >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > >> >> -- >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >
-- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
