Now you've gone and made a great point :) What I was trying to say is that I try to help in every way I can, and will gladly debate any matter at hand, mainly if I have knowledge to support it. I just hope not to hurt any feelings if I say bad things about xp and such.
On Jun 15, 10:46 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > we're all here are pretty much act like brothers...lol, some of here are > pretty much seniors here... > and we discuss not accuse or something like that.... > also spam here is prette annoying..but it has it's positiveness, spam often > target active forums and popular sites...which means our group has became > popular and well known...rite? ^^ > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:40 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > One of the things I find curious about our group is that most people > > do act civilized :) I mean, after posting some time ago that I didn't > > like xp and liked vista, I feared everyone would be all over me, but I > > also made my points regarding each subject. I also noticed a few days > > ago there were a spammer littering the group, this is not an easy > > thing to filter, is it? > > > On Jun 15, 10:20 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > To tell the truth I never did look at laptops with any respect > > > whatsoever as I find true computers to be desktops. The exception of > > > course are desktop replacements, which I've had the pleasure of > > > working with, and definitely pwn any measly regular branded laptop. So > > > I'm kinda in a tough spot when owning myself one of those laptops, and > > > worse since I happened to choose a business model that disables any > > > email support, only phone :( > > > > On Jun 15, 10:16 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > haha, dont be, juz brag to them and let them PWNED !! ^^ > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Well, I gotta be careful, if after installing V1.1 my hdd score went > > > > > almost a whole wei point, then now it might reach 7.9... and then how > > > > > will I face people with laptops costing 4 times what mine cost? :) > > > > > > On Jun 15, 10:06 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > well, i could make a V1.1 and V1.2 suggestion / bugs report > > section, juz > > > > > > like espi have done many article in the group, but pinned topics > > are not > > > > > in > > > > > > my authority, as MAD_BEAST limit it to prevent clutter.. > > > > > > > as for the installation method of the V1.1E, juz click and > > proceed...no > > > > > > uninstall and stuff...simple but powerful..juz like an > > update/patch.. > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > In that case some topics might have to be joined together, and > > closed > > > > > > > so they info would never get lost between lots of posting. After > > all > > > > > > > the pinned topics could be discussed on new topics, right? > > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:54 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think MAD_BEAST in the past said something like there was a > > limited > > > > > > > > amount of things we could sticky (like 3 maybe). I could be > > wrong > > > > > > > > though > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:51 AM, tribaljet < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > It was nothing, I'm glad to help, and I could mention if I > > had a > > > > > quirk > > > > > > > > > or two but that issue in particular would never go unnoticed > > :) > > > > > Would > > > > > > > > > the install procedure be the same or in this specific case > > the > > > > > install > > > > > > > > > could be done without uninstalling, like an update? > > > > > > > > > And since you're a moderator, can't you pin a topic about > > your > > > > > > > > > releases? I feel we should have a couple of pinned topics, > > like a > > > > > faq > > > > > > > > > regarding the most common issues like addreg howto and proper > > > > > install > > > > > > > > > methods, wei scores (I know there is a topic already, but a > > cleaned > > > > > > > > > one with only the scores and the specs for those scores), a > > cleaned > > > > > up > > > > > > > > > download section, among a few other things. I firmly believe > > this > > > > > > > > > group has done many many things in the past before I joined, > > and > > > > > I've > > > > > > > > > seen some of the wonders myself, but there are too many > > leftovers > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > early days that haven't been cleaned up after all the ruckus > > with > > > > > > > > > intel. > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:44 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> well, im not saying that it's like installing a full > > driver...it's > > > > > > > like a > > > > > > > > >> patch to an already installed driver... > > > > > > > > > >> im planning an upgrade coz V1.1 is pretty old now, and V1.2 > > is > > > > > under > > > > > > > early > > > > > > > > >> stage of development... > > > > > > > > >> some that u can expect from the update is... > > > > > > > > > >> - fully working with netbooks, which apparently most netbook > > users > > > > > > > wanted it > > > > > > > > >> back then... > > > > > > > > >> - some minor bug fixed such as MSI code which make PCI slows > > down > > > > > such > > > > > > > as in > > > > > > > > >> ur case... > > > > > > > > >> - and some major bug regarding performance.. > > > > > > > > > >> i had to handed to u tribaljet..^^ without ur report on the > > V1.1 > > > > > not > > > > > > > long > > > > > > > > >> ago, i never knew what the bugs are, finally now V1.1 will > > be > > > > > renew > > > > > > > > >> again...^^ i might released it next week for testers... > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:35 PM, tribaljet < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > So you're saying those who have V1.1 installed should > > install > > > > > this > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > >> > version? And what kind of improvements might we expect? I > > > > > personally > > > > > > > > >> > ask because you know I've had my share of problems > > regarding > > > > > driver > > > > > > > > >> > installs, which after your help were solved and now things > > work > > > > > > > better > > > > > > > > >> > than ever. > > > > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 9:29 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > ah, maybe pretty soon i wanna make an update on > > V1.1...full > > > > > > > improvements > > > > > > > > >> > > coming soon for V1.1 users ^^ > > > > > > > > >> > > while waiting for the V1.2, V1.1 can enjoy an > > > > > upgrade...V1.1E... > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:26 PM, tribaljet < > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > It seems the majority of netbooks use 945gse, but a > > few also > > > > > use > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > same as mine, 945gme with the device id 27ae. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jun 15, 9:21 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > hmm, pardon me if it's off topic but what chipset > > that > > > > > most > > > > > > > netbooks > > > > > > > > >> > > > use?? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > i think i know how to make V1.1 fully compatible > > with > > > > > > > netbooks.... > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM, tribaljet < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > So, between 166mhz (the power saving mode and > > default > > > > > for > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > chipsets), 250 (the mobile default) and 400 > > (desktop > > > > > > > default), if > > > > > > > > >> > you > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > have 400 is great, making the fsb the only > > limiting > > > > > factor > > > > > > > in your > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > graphic performance. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:56 am, Espionage724 < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but your > > chipset > > > > > > > resembles > > > > > > > > >> > more > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general > > chip. I > > > > > think > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > >> > can't > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock is, > > at > > > > > least > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > >> > default, > > > > > > > > >> > > > at > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent > > desktop > > > > > > > chipset but > > > > > > > > >> > you > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock > > speeds. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even 100% > > trust it > > > > > > > seeing as > > > > > > > > >> > it > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you have > > a > > > > > 940gml > > > > > > > chipset, > > > > > > > > >> > > > which > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > has > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for core > > duos > > > > > and > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > likes. I > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > think > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > the only limitations you have are the fsbs > > of > > > > > cpus, > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >> > maximum > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > amount > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at 166mhz > > > > > instead of > > > > > > > 250, > > > > > > > > >> > which > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > explains your gaming performance. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I guess? > > Which > > > > > I > > > > > > > guess in > > > > > > > > >> > > > turn > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > would > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> mean lower transfer rate between devices? > > But > > > > > I'm > > ... > > read more » -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
