yeah, i also try to block some msg but not always...im confuse how in the hell that spam can get through even we have so many mods....some spam can be pretty annoying to me when i check my gmail...
@tribaljet no worries, we here respect each person's opinion ^^ as long no user swears or disrespect each other, we're all ok... On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:52 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Now you've gone and made a great point :) What I was trying to say is > that I try to help in every way I can, and will gladly debate any > matter at hand, mainly if I have knowledge to support it. I just hope > not to hurt any feelings if I say bad things about xp and such. > > On Jun 15, 10:46 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > we're all here are pretty much act like brothers...lol, some of here are > > pretty much seniors here... > > and we discuss not accuse or something like that.... > > also spam here is prette annoying..but it has it's positiveness, spam > often > > target active forums and popular sites...which means our group has became > > popular and well known...rite? ^^ > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:40 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > One of the things I find curious about our group is that most people > > > do act civilized :) I mean, after posting some time ago that I didn't > > > like xp and liked vista, I feared everyone would be all over me, but I > > > also made my points regarding each subject. I also noticed a few days > > > ago there were a spammer littering the group, this is not an easy > > > thing to filter, is it? > > > > > On Jun 15, 10:20 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > To tell the truth I never did look at laptops with any respect > > > > whatsoever as I find true computers to be desktops. The exception of > > > > course are desktop replacements, which I've had the pleasure of > > > > working with, and definitely pwn any measly regular branded laptop. > So > > > > I'm kinda in a tough spot when owning myself one of those laptops, > and > > > > worse since I happened to choose a business model that disables any > > > > email support, only phone :( > > > > > > On Jun 15, 10:16 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > haha, dont be, juz brag to them and let them PWNED !! ^^ > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Well, I gotta be careful, if after installing V1.1 my hdd score > went > > > > > > almost a whole wei point, then now it might reach 7.9... and then > how > > > > > > will I face people with laptops costing 4 times what mine cost? > :) > > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 10:06 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > well, i could make a V1.1 and V1.2 suggestion / bugs report > > > section, juz > > > > > > > like espi have done many article in the group, but pinned > topics > > > are not > > > > > > in > > > > > > > my authority, as MAD_BEAST limit it to prevent clutter.. > > > > > > > > > as for the installation method of the V1.1E, juz click and > > > proceed...no > > > > > > > uninstall and stuff...simple but powerful..juz like an > > > update/patch.. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > In that case some topics might have to be joined together, > and > > > closed > > > > > > > > so they info would never get lost between lots of posting. > After > > > all > > > > > > > > the pinned topics could be discussed on new topics, right? > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:54 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think MAD_BEAST in the past said something like there was > a > > > limited > > > > > > > > > amount of things we could sticky (like 3 maybe). I could be > > > wrong > > > > > > > > > though > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:51 AM, tribaljet < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It was nothing, I'm glad to help, and I could mention if > I > > > had a > > > > > > quirk > > > > > > > > > > or two but that issue in particular would never go > unnoticed > > > :) > > > > > > Would > > > > > > > > > > the install procedure be the same or in this specific > case > > > the > > > > > > install > > > > > > > > > > could be done without uninstalling, like an update? > > > > > > > > > > And since you're a moderator, can't you pin a topic about > > > your > > > > > > > > > > releases? I feel we should have a couple of pinned > topics, > > > like a > > > > > > faq > > > > > > > > > > regarding the most common issues like addreg howto and > proper > > > > > > install > > > > > > > > > > methods, wei scores (I know there is a topic already, but > a > > > cleaned > > > > > > > > > > one with only the scores and the specs for those scores), > a > > > cleaned > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > > > download section, among a few other things. I firmly > believe > > > this > > > > > > > > > > group has done many many things in the past before I > joined, > > > and > > > > > > I've > > > > > > > > > > seen some of the wonders myself, but there are too many > > > leftovers > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > early days that haven't been cleaned up after all the > ruckus > > > with > > > > > > > > > > intel. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:44 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> well, im not saying that it's like installing a full > > > driver...it's > > > > > > > > like a > > > > > > > > > >> patch to an already installed driver... > > > > > > > > > > > >> im planning an upgrade coz V1.1 is pretty old now, and > V1.2 > > > is > > > > > > under > > > > > > > > early > > > > > > > > > >> stage of development... > > > > > > > > > >> some that u can expect from the update is... > > > > > > > > > > > >> - fully working with netbooks, which apparently most > netbook > > > users > > > > > > > > wanted it > > > > > > > > > >> back then... > > > > > > > > > >> - some minor bug fixed such as MSI code which make PCI > slows > > > down > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > as in > > > > > > > > > >> ur case... > > > > > > > > > >> - and some major bug regarding performance.. > > > > > > > > > > > >> i had to handed to u tribaljet..^^ without ur report on > the > > > V1.1 > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > long > > > > > > > > > >> ago, i never knew what the bugs are, finally now V1.1 > will > > > be > > > > > > renew > > > > > > > > > >> again...^^ i might released it next week for testers... > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:35 PM, tribaljet < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > So you're saying those who have V1.1 installed should > > > install > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > >> > version? And what kind of improvements might we > expect? I > > > > > > personally > > > > > > > > > >> > ask because you know I've had my share of problems > > > regarding > > > > > > driver > > > > > > > > > >> > installs, which after your help were solved and now > things > > > work > > > > > > > > better > > > > > > > > > >> > than ever. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 9:29 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > ah, maybe pretty soon i wanna make an update on > > > V1.1...full > > > > > > > > improvements > > > > > > > > > >> > > coming soon for V1.1 users ^^ > > > > > > > > > >> > > while waiting for the V1.2, V1.1 can enjoy an > > > > > > upgrade...V1.1E... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:26 PM, tribaljet < > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > It seems the majority of netbooks use 945gse, but > a > > > few also > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > same as mine, 945gme with the device id 27ae. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jun 15, 9:21 am, AngelicTears < > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > hmm, pardon me if it's off topic but what > chipset > > > that > > > > > > most > > > > > > > > netbooks > > > > > > > > > >> > > > use?? > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > i think i know how to make V1.1 fully compatible > > > with > > > > > > > > netbooks.... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM, tribaljet < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > So, between 166mhz (the power saving mode and > > > default > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > chipsets), 250 (the mobile default) and 400 > > > (desktop > > > > > > > > default), if > > > > > > > > > >> > you > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > have 400 is great, making the fsb the only > > > limiting > > > > > > factor > > > > > > > > in your > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > graphic performance. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:56 am, Espionage724 < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but > your > > > chipset > > > > > > > > resembles > > > > > > > > > >> > more > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general > > > chip. I > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > >> > can't > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock > is, > > > at > > > > > > least > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > >> > default, > > > > > > > > > >> > > > at > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent > > > desktop > > > > > > > > chipset but > > > > > > > > > >> > you > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock > > > speeds. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even > 100% > > > trust it > > > > > > > > seeing as > > > > > > > > > >> > it > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, > tribaljet < > > > > > > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you > have > > > a > > > > > > 940gml > > > > > > > > chipset, > > > > > > > > > >> > > > which > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for > core > > > duos > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > >> > likes. I > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > the only limitations you have are the > fsbs > > > of > > > > > > cpus, > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > >> > maximum > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > amount > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at > 166mhz > > > > > > instead of > > > > > > > > 250, > > > > > > > > > >> > which > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > explains your gaming performance. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I > guess? > > > Which > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > guess in > > > > > > > > > >> > > > turn > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> mean lower transfer rate between > devices? > > > But > > > > > > I'm > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
