Meh idc. I use XP atm only because it runs the best on my laptop. If I had the hardware, Windows 7 would be my favorite. It mostly depends on hardware I guess though (XP runs the best on my laptop, I legally own Vista basic, but I like windows 7 the best ^.^)
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:52 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Now you've gone and made a great point :) What I was trying to say is > that I try to help in every way I can, and will gladly debate any > matter at hand, mainly if I have knowledge to support it. I just hope > not to hurt any feelings if I say bad things about xp and such. > > On Jun 15, 10:46 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> we're all here are pretty much act like brothers...lol, some of here are >> pretty much seniors here... >> and we discuss not accuse or something like that.... >> also spam here is prette annoying..but it has it's positiveness, spam often >> target active forums and popular sites...which means our group has became >> popular and well known...rite? ^^ >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:40 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > One of the things I find curious about our group is that most people >> > do act civilized :) I mean, after posting some time ago that I didn't >> > like xp and liked vista, I feared everyone would be all over me, but I >> > also made my points regarding each subject. I also noticed a few days >> > ago there were a spammer littering the group, this is not an easy >> > thing to filter, is it? >> >> > On Jun 15, 10:20 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > To tell the truth I never did look at laptops with any respect >> > > whatsoever as I find true computers to be desktops. The exception of >> > > course are desktop replacements, which I've had the pleasure of >> > > working with, and definitely pwn any measly regular branded laptop. So >> > > I'm kinda in a tough spot when owning myself one of those laptops, and >> > > worse since I happened to choose a business model that disables any >> > > email support, only phone :( >> >> > > On Jun 15, 10:16 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > haha, dont be, juz brag to them and let them PWNED !! ^^ >> >> > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > Well, I gotta be careful, if after installing V1.1 my hdd score went >> > > > > almost a whole wei point, then now it might reach 7.9... and then how >> > > > > will I face people with laptops costing 4 times what mine cost? :) >> >> > > > > On Jun 15, 10:06 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > well, i could make a V1.1 and V1.2 suggestion / bugs report >> > section, juz >> > > > > > like espi have done many article in the group, but pinned topics >> > are not >> > > > > in >> > > > > > my authority, as MAD_BEAST limit it to prevent clutter.. >> >> > > > > > as for the installation method of the V1.1E, juz click and >> > proceed...no >> > > > > > uninstall and stuff...simple but powerful..juz like an >> > update/patch.. >> >> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > In that case some topics might have to be joined together, and >> > closed >> > > > > > > so they info would never get lost between lots of posting. After >> > all >> > > > > > > the pinned topics could be discussed on new topics, right? >> >> > > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:54 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > I think MAD_BEAST in the past said something like there was a >> > limited >> > > > > > > > amount of things we could sticky (like 3 maybe). I could be >> > wrong >> > > > > > > > though >> >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:51 AM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > It was nothing, I'm glad to help, and I could mention if I >> > had a >> > > > > quirk >> > > > > > > > > or two but that issue in particular would never go unnoticed >> > :) >> > > > > Would >> > > > > > > > > the install procedure be the same or in this specific case >> > the >> > > > > install >> > > > > > > > > could be done without uninstalling, like an update? >> > > > > > > > > And since you're a moderator, can't you pin a topic about >> > your >> > > > > > > > > releases? I feel we should have a couple of pinned topics, >> > like a >> > > > > faq >> > > > > > > > > regarding the most common issues like addreg howto and proper >> > > > > install >> > > > > > > > > methods, wei scores (I know there is a topic already, but a >> > cleaned >> > > > > > > > > one with only the scores and the specs for those scores), a >> > cleaned >> > > > > up >> > > > > > > > > download section, among a few other things. I firmly believe >> > this >> > > > > > > > > group has done many many things in the past before I joined, >> > and >> > > > > I've >> > > > > > > > > seen some of the wonders myself, but there are too many >> > leftovers >> > > > > from >> > > > > > > > > early days that haven't been cleaned up after all the ruckus >> > with >> > > > > > > > > intel. >> >> > > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:44 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> well, im not saying that it's like installing a full >> > driver...it's >> > > > > > > like a >> > > > > > > > >> patch to an already installed driver... >> >> > > > > > > > >> im planning an upgrade coz V1.1 is pretty old now, and V1.2 >> > is >> > > > > under >> > > > > > > early >> > > > > > > > >> stage of development... >> > > > > > > > >> some that u can expect from the update is... >> >> > > > > > > > >> - fully working with netbooks, which apparently most netbook >> > users >> > > > > > > wanted it >> > > > > > > > >> back then... >> > > > > > > > >> - some minor bug fixed such as MSI code which make PCI slows >> > down >> > > > > such >> > > > > > > as in >> > > > > > > > >> ur case... >> > > > > > > > >> - and some major bug regarding performance.. >> >> > > > > > > > >> i had to handed to u tribaljet..^^ without ur report on the >> > V1.1 >> > > > > not >> > > > > > > long >> > > > > > > > >> ago, i never knew what the bugs are, finally now V1.1 will >> > be >> > > > > renew >> > > > > > > > >> again...^^ i might released it next week for testers... >> >> > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:35 PM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected] >> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > So you're saying those who have V1.1 installed should >> > install >> > > > > this >> > > > > > > new >> > > > > > > > >> > version? And what kind of improvements might we expect? I >> > > > > personally >> > > > > > > > >> > ask because you know I've had my share of problems >> > regarding >> > > > > driver >> > > > > > > > >> > installs, which after your help were solved and now things >> > work >> > > > > > > better >> > > > > > > > >> > than ever. >> >> > > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 9:29 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > ah, maybe pretty soon i wanna make an update on >> > V1.1...full >> > > > > > > improvements >> > > > > > > > >> > > coming soon for V1.1 users ^^ >> > > > > > > > >> > > while waiting for the V1.2, V1.1 can enjoy an >> > > > > upgrade...V1.1E... >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:26 PM, tribaljet < >> > > > > [email protected] >> >> > > > > > > > >> > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > It seems the majority of netbooks use 945gse, but a >> > few also >> > > > > use >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >> > > > same as mine, 945gme with the device id 27ae. >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Jun 15, 9:21 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > hmm, pardon me if it's off topic but what chipset >> > that >> > > > > most >> > > > > > > netbooks >> > > > > > > > >> > > > use?? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > i think i know how to make V1.1 fully compatible >> > with >> > > > > > > netbooks.... >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM, tribaljet < >> > > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > So, between 166mhz (the power saving mode and >> > default >> > > > > for >> > > > > > > some >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > chipsets), 250 (the mobile default) and 400 >> > (desktop >> > > > > > > default), if >> > > > > > > > >> > you >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > have 400 is great, making the fsb the only >> > limiting >> > > > > factor >> > > > > > > in your >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > graphic performance. >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:56 am, Espionage724 < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet < >> > > > > > > > >> > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but your >> > chipset >> > > > > > > resembles >> > > > > > > > >> > more >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general >> > chip. I >> > > > > think >> > > > > > > you >> > > > > > > > >> > can't >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock is, >> > at >> > > > > least >> > > > > > > at >> > > > > > > > >> > default, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > at >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent >> > desktop >> > > > > > > chipset but >> > > > > > > > >> > you >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock >> > speeds. >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 < >> > > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >> > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even 100% >> > trust it >> > > > > > > seeing as >> > > > > > > > >> > it >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet < >> > > > > > > > >> > [email protected] >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you have >> > a >> > > > > 940gml >> > > > > > > chipset, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > which >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > has >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for core >> > duos >> > > > > and >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >> > likes. I >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > think >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > the only limitations you have are the fsbs >> > of >> > > > > cpus, >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > >> > maximum >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > amount >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at 166mhz >> > > > > instead of >> > > > > > > 250, >> > > > > > > > >> > which >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > explains your gaming performance. >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 < >> > > > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I guess? >> > Which >> > > > > I >> > > > > > > guess in >> > > > > > > > >> > > > turn >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > would >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> mean lower transfer rate between devices? >> > But >> > > > > I'm >> >> ... >> >> read more » > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
