To tell the truth I never did look at laptops with any respect whatsoever as I find true computers to be desktops. The exception of course are desktop replacements, which I've had the pleasure of working with, and definitely pwn any measly regular branded laptop. So I'm kinda in a tough spot when owning myself one of those laptops, and worse since I happened to choose a business model that disables any email support, only phone :(
On Jun 15, 10:16 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > haha, dont be, juz brag to them and let them PWNED !! ^^ > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, I gotta be careful, if after installing V1.1 my hdd score went > > almost a whole wei point, then now it might reach 7.9... and then how > > will I face people with laptops costing 4 times what mine cost? :) > > > On Jun 15, 10:06 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > well, i could make a V1.1 and V1.2 suggestion / bugs report section, juz > > > like espi have done many article in the group, but pinned topics are not > > in > > > my authority, as MAD_BEAST limit it to prevent clutter.. > > > > as for the installation method of the V1.1E, juz click and proceed...no > > > uninstall and stuff...simple but powerful..juz like an update/patch.. > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > In that case some topics might have to be joined together, and closed > > > > so they info would never get lost between lots of posting. After all > > > > the pinned topics could be discussed on new topics, right? > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:54 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think MAD_BEAST in the past said something like there was a limited > > > > > amount of things we could sticky (like 3 maybe). I could be wrong > > > > > though > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:51 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > It was nothing, I'm glad to help, and I could mention if I had a > > quirk > > > > > > or two but that issue in particular would never go unnoticed :) > > Would > > > > > > the install procedure be the same or in this specific case the > > install > > > > > > could be done without uninstalling, like an update? > > > > > > And since you're a moderator, can't you pin a topic about your > > > > > > releases? I feel we should have a couple of pinned topics, like a > > faq > > > > > > regarding the most common issues like addreg howto and proper > > install > > > > > > methods, wei scores (I know there is a topic already, but a cleaned > > > > > > one with only the scores and the specs for those scores), a cleaned > > up > > > > > > download section, among a few other things. I firmly believe this > > > > > > group has done many many things in the past before I joined, and > > I've > > > > > > seen some of the wonders myself, but there are too many leftovers > > from > > > > > > early days that haven't been cleaned up after all the ruckus with > > > > > > intel. > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 9:44 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> well, im not saying that it's like installing a full driver...it's > > > > like a > > > > > >> patch to an already installed driver... > > > > > > >> im planning an upgrade coz V1.1 is pretty old now, and V1.2 is > > under > > > > early > > > > > >> stage of development... > > > > > >> some that u can expect from the update is... > > > > > > >> - fully working with netbooks, which apparently most netbook users > > > > wanted it > > > > > >> back then... > > > > > >> - some minor bug fixed such as MSI code which make PCI slows down > > such > > > > as in > > > > > >> ur case... > > > > > >> - and some major bug regarding performance.. > > > > > > >> i had to handed to u tribaljet..^^ without ur report on the V1.1 > > not > > > > long > > > > > >> ago, i never knew what the bugs are, finally now V1.1 will be > > renew > > > > > >> again...^^ i might released it next week for testers... > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:35 PM, tribaljet <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > So you're saying those who have V1.1 installed should install > > this > > > > new > > > > > >> > version? And what kind of improvements might we expect? I > > personally > > > > > >> > ask because you know I've had my share of problems regarding > > driver > > > > > >> > installs, which after your help were solved and now things work > > > > better > > > > > >> > than ever. > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 9:29 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > ah, maybe pretty soon i wanna make an update on V1.1...full > > > > improvements > > > > > >> > > coming soon for V1.1 users ^^ > > > > > >> > > while waiting for the V1.2, V1.1 can enjoy an > > upgrade...V1.1E... > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:26 PM, tribaljet < > > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > It seems the majority of netbooks use 945gse, but a few also > > use > > > > the > > > > > >> > > > same as mine, 945gme with the device id 27ae. > > > > > > >> > > > On Jun 15, 9:21 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > hmm, pardon me if it's off topic but what chipset that > > most > > > > netbooks > > > > > >> > > > use?? > > > > > >> > > > > i think i know how to make V1.1 fully compatible with > > > > netbooks.... > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM, tribaljet < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > So, between 166mhz (the power saving mode and default > > for > > > > some > > > > > >> > > > > > chipsets), 250 (the mobile default) and 400 (desktop > > > > default), if > > > > > >> > you > > > > > >> > > > > > have 400 is great, making the fsb the only limiting > > factor > > > > in your > > > > > >> > > > > > graphic performance. > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:56 am, Espionage724 < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think GPUz in the past shows 400Mhz > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Maybe it increases the speed a bit, but your chipset > > > > resembles > > > > > >> > more > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the 945gms than 945gm which is the general chip. I > > think > > > > you > > > > > >> > can't > > > > > >> > > > > > > > activate dual channel, and your gpu clock is, at > > least > > > > at > > > > > >> > default, > > > > > >> > > > at > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 166mhz. I'm not sure what's the equivalent desktop > > > > chipset but > > > > > >> > you > > > > > >> > > > > > > > should use gpu-z to check the actual clock speeds. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 8:01 am, Espionage724 < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> hmmm, but GMABooster (not that I even 100% trust it > > > > seeing as > > > > > >> > it > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> doesn't work) says I run at 200Mhz. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Since you have a celeron, I think you have a > > 940gml > > > > chipset, > > > > > >> > > > which > > > > > >> > > > > > has > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > a gma 950 gpu. 945gm chipsets are for core duos > > and > > > > the > > > > > >> > likes. I > > > > > >> > > > > > think > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > the only limitations you have are the fsbs of > > cpus, > > > > the > > > > > >> > maximum > > > > > >> > > > > > amount > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > of ram and a slower gpu, working at 166mhz > > instead of > > > > 250, > > > > > >> > which > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > explains your gaming performance. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Jun 15, 7:48 am, Espionage724 < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> No, it means my chipset is lesser I guess? Which > > I > > > > guess in > > > > > >> > > > turn > > > > > >> > > > > > would > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> mean lower transfer rate between devices? But > > I'm > > > > pretty > > > > > >> > sure > > > > > >> > > > my > > > > > >> > > > > > 945gm > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> is the same as anyone else who has a 945gm > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:35 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > >> > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > You sure? So it means you have a lesser gma > > 950? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > On Jun 15, 7:30 am, Espionage724 < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> 945GM for graphics, i940 for chipset > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:28 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > >> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > I think the increase of the processor will > > be > > > > felt > > > > > >> > more or > > > > > >> > > > > > less > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > easily, and the increase in graphics just > > might > > > > make > > > > > >> > your > > > > > >> > > > > > whole aero > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > experience less jerky. You have a > > 945gm/gms/gme > > > > or a > > > > > >> > > > > > 940/943gml? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > On Jun 15, 2:10 am, Espionage724 < > > > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Ok heres my new results: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Windows 7 MD v1.1 > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz (original clock) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> 2GB 222Mhz DDR2 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.1 > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.5 > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.0 > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.0 > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.3 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Same machine only with PCI/PCI-E/DDR > > frequency > > > > jacked > > > > > >> > up > > > > > >> > > > to > > > > > >> > > > > > max, and > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> CPU clock at 1.9Ghz (via SetFSB) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Processor: 3.6 (slightly boosted) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Memory (RAM): 4.7 (slightly boosted) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Graphics: 2.9 (significiant boost) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Gaming Graphics: 3.1 (slightly boosted) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Primary Hard Disk: 4.4 (slightly boosted) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> So maybe the CPU does make the difference. > > Idk > > > > if I'm > > > > > >> > > > that > > > > > >> > > > > > convinced > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> though since gaming > > ... > > read more » -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
