That's weird because my steam client worked without any CTDs or
anything like that. I would recommend you to uninstall and reinstall
steam, but since I don't know if the games contents would be deleted,
I won't say anything about it. But the game downloaded quite fast,
like at 80% bandwidth usage.

On Jul 20, 5:07 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> aw man, i still struggle to make steam work on my system...it quits when
> updating! and at 0%..again and again..lol...any way to make it work??
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yea it runs good with my 3200, gameplay isn't bad either, quite fun :)
>
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:52 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > How is it? Good gameplay? It runs ok with your comp? That's great
> > > man :)
> > > Is it my impression or it looks similar to Alien Breed Impact?
>
> > > On Jul 20, 4:43 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Hmm Alien Swarm was the first game in a long time that I actually
> > >> enjoyed playing without worrying about FPS ^.^
>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:43 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> > It doesn't matter where someone comes from, attitude is attitude. And
> > >> > when I talked about 60fps, I meant it was the most enjoyable
> > >> > experience and the way the game was developed to be played at. Of
> > >> > course 60fps aren't the only way to enjoy a game, far from it. We can
> > >> > perfectly enjoy playing at half of it, I'm not saying otherwise, I'm
> > >> > playing WoW right now and even though indoor areas rise to 60fps at
> > >> > best, when I'm at detailed and/or crowded outdoors it falls to 10fps,
> > >> > but that doesn't mean I don't enjoy playing every single bit of the
> > >> > game. Hell, as mentioned before, some games don't even play properly
> > >> > when running higher than 30fps.
>
> > >> > On Jul 19, 10:04 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> Ummm dude, we aren't trying to condone that all high end pc owners
> > are rich
> > >> >> folk that do nothing but brag, I have a high end gaming rig which I
> > >> >> researched and built to my exact wants but I don't brag about it
> > around
> > >> >> here, now you may or may not have meant it but that post about how
> > 60FPS is
> > >> >> the only way to play did sound demeaning and imposing over people
> > here who
> > >> >> may be either less fortunate financially or simply do not have the
> > time to
> > >> >> aquire these high powered PC's. Now 9xxssf is open to everyone and we
> > >> >> welcome every new member like a brother but when people come into the
> > group
> > >> >> and more or less just put it out there how good their systems are and
> > how
> > >> >> much everyone else's system pales in comparison then even you can see
> > how
> > >> >> this could piss people o...@everyone Now let's just put this behind
> > us and
> > >> >> move on, the last thing we need is a flame war in this community.
>
> > >> >> THEfog
>
> > >> >> On 20/07/2010 6:50 AM, "Cef" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> >> @tribaljet
>
> > >> >> Sure I come here to brag only, I've been bragging and ranting in this
> > >> >> community for about 2 years, I bragged like hell about how my 915g
> > >> >> onboard graphics could run F.E.A.R. in mid settings. Heck, I even
> > made
> > >> >> a bragging compatibility list of the games my 915g could run back in
> > >> >> the day.
>
> > >> >> Come on, seriously, 30 FPS solid, no variation in a buggy game, using
> > >> >> the minimum recommended specs in old drivers and no updates? If the
> > >> >> maximum FPS you get is 30 you'd most likely fall into 15 FPS whenever
> > >> >> more than two cars are being rendered, then it's not choppy it's
> > slide
> > >> >> show. Also you don't need a monster screen to see the difference
> > >> >> between crappy PS3 blurry textures, which is what GTA IV looks in
> > mid-
> > >> >> low, and decent looking PC graphics, just check some screenshots and
> > >> >> compare.
>
> > >> >> Let's skip the phallic talk, I don't say size matters in all games,
> > >> >> but GTA IV sucks VRAM like a damn leech, so the less VRAM you have
> > the
> > >> >> less performance range you have to prevent FPS loss and the narrower
> > >> >> your margin is to rise the settings beyond low.
>
> > >> >> Speaking of forums you'd probably like to google GTA IV low FPS, and
> > >> >> see hundreds of posts on how the game is slow and choppy on mid-high
> > >> >> end machines, so all of those folks, like me, like to brag recklessly
> > >> >> about their machines or are just proof that this particular game
> > needs
> > >> >> more hardware to run properly than the so-called megapixel 2010 games
> > >> >> you say low end rigs are supposed to play spectacularly nice? What
> > >> >> about youtube also? Rigs like the one you mention or even better
> > >> >> barely reach 25 fps on GTA IV, there's this video:
> >http://il.youtube.com/watch?v=c2_1uFIHk6A&feature=relatedNowthat's
> > >> >> smooth and good looking!
>
> > >> >> Shadows won't kill games, F.E.A.R. 2 takes advantage of shadowing and
> > >> >> even Ambient Occlusion with no loss of performance whatsoever. And
> > >> >> yeah it's awful to see how three year old laptop owners actually brag
> > >> >> about improbable stuff and their incredible PC tuning skills, mocking
> > >> >> an honest opinion, and claiming that "rich folks" don't know how to
> > >> >> keep a PC running, that really makes me boo hoo.
>
> > >> >> In the end we'll keep on arguing about mine's best and yours suck, so
> > >> >> let's get things straight, old PCs have potential, I know it because
> > I
> > >> >> have a couple of them and I've seen how a Pentium D @2.8, 2GB DDR RAM
> > >> >> and a 8400 GS can lift DMC IV to 30 fps on mid-settings, but saying
> > >> >> that they can run new games better than newer and more powerful PCs
> > >> >> it's ridiculous. If you can juice your PC and get the most of
> > >> >> performance then it's great, that's what this group is about, but
> > just
> > >> >> don't exaggerate and use your "experience" to try to mock and demean
> > >> >> others.
>
> > >> >> .C.
>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > >> > --
> > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > >> --
> > >> Acer TravelMate 2480
> > >> GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz   RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz
> > >>   HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA
>
> > > --
> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > --
> > Acer TravelMate 2480
> > GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz   RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz
> >   HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA
>
> > --
> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> --
> Laptop:
> Acer Aspire
> Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> Intel GMA 950 IGP
> Intel 945 Chipset
> 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> 80GB standard PATA HDD
> Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04
>
> hmmm :
> Athlon II X4 630 OCd @ 3.225GHz
> Sapphire HD 5670 512MB Artic Cooling
> MSI 770-C45 MoBo
> Kingston 2GB RAM DDR3 1333
> 750GB Samsung SATA2 HDD
> Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to