How is it? Good gameplay? It runs ok with your comp? That's great man :) Is it my impression or it looks similar to Alien Breed Impact?
On Jul 20, 4:43 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm Alien Swarm was the first game in a long time that I actually > enjoyed playing without worrying about FPS ^.^ > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:43 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > It doesn't matter where someone comes from, attitude is attitude. And > > when I talked about 60fps, I meant it was the most enjoyable > > experience and the way the game was developed to be played at. Of > > course 60fps aren't the only way to enjoy a game, far from it. We can > > perfectly enjoy playing at half of it, I'm not saying otherwise, I'm > > playing WoW right now and even though indoor areas rise to 60fps at > > best, when I'm at detailed and/or crowded outdoors it falls to 10fps, > > but that doesn't mean I don't enjoy playing every single bit of the > > game. Hell, as mentioned before, some games don't even play properly > > when running higher than 30fps. > > > On Jul 19, 10:04 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ummm dude, we aren't trying to condone that all high end pc owners are rich > >> folk that do nothing but brag, I have a high end gaming rig which I > >> researched and built to my exact wants but I don't brag about it around > >> here, now you may or may not have meant it but that post about how 60FPS is > >> the only way to play did sound demeaning and imposing over people here who > >> may be either less fortunate financially or simply do not have the time to > >> aquire these high powered PC's. Now 9xxssf is open to everyone and we > >> welcome every new member like a brother but when people come into the group > >> and more or less just put it out there how good their systems are and how > >> much everyone else's system pales in comparison then even you can see how > >> this could piss people o...@everyone Now let's just put this behind us and > >> move on, the last thing we need is a flame war in this community. > > >> THEfog > > >> On 20/07/2010 6:50 AM, "Cef" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> @tribaljet > > >> Sure I come here to brag only, I've been bragging and ranting in this > >> community for about 2 years, I bragged like hell about how my 915g > >> onboard graphics could run F.E.A.R. in mid settings. Heck, I even made > >> a bragging compatibility list of the games my 915g could run back in > >> the day. > > >> Come on, seriously, 30 FPS solid, no variation in a buggy game, using > >> the minimum recommended specs in old drivers and no updates? If the > >> maximum FPS you get is 30 you'd most likely fall into 15 FPS whenever > >> more than two cars are being rendered, then it's not choppy it's slide > >> show. Also you don't need a monster screen to see the difference > >> between crappy PS3 blurry textures, which is what GTA IV looks in mid- > >> low, and decent looking PC graphics, just check some screenshots and > >> compare. > > >> Let's skip the phallic talk, I don't say size matters in all games, > >> but GTA IV sucks VRAM like a damn leech, so the less VRAM you have the > >> less performance range you have to prevent FPS loss and the narrower > >> your margin is to rise the settings beyond low. > > >> Speaking of forums you'd probably like to google GTA IV low FPS, and > >> see hundreds of posts on how the game is slow and choppy on mid-high > >> end machines, so all of those folks, like me, like to brag recklessly > >> about their machines or are just proof that this particular game needs > >> more hardware to run properly than the so-called megapixel 2010 games > >> you say low end rigs are supposed to play spectacularly nice? What > >> about youtube also? Rigs like the one you mention or even better > >> barely reach 25 fps on GTA IV, there's this > >> video:http://il.youtube.com/watch?v=c2_1uFIHk6A&feature=relatedNowthat's > >> smooth and good looking! > > >> Shadows won't kill games, F.E.A.R. 2 takes advantage of shadowing and > >> even Ambient Occlusion with no loss of performance whatsoever. And > >> yeah it's awful to see how three year old laptop owners actually brag > >> about improbable stuff and their incredible PC tuning skills, mocking > >> an honest opinion, and claiming that "rich folks" don't know how to > >> keep a PC running, that really makes me boo hoo. > > >> In the end we'll keep on arguing about mine's best and yours suck, so > >> let's get things straight, old PCs have potential, I know it because I > >> have a couple of them and I've seen how a Pentium D @2.8, 2GB DDR RAM > >> and a 8400 GS can lift DMC IV to 30 fps on mid-settings, but saying > >> that they can run new games better than newer and more powerful PCs > >> it's ridiculous. If you can juice your PC and get the most of > >> performance then it's great, that's what this group is about, but just > >> don't exaggerate and use your "experience" to try to mock and demean > >> others. > > >> .C. > > >> -- > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Acer TravelMate 2480 > GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz > HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
