@jeremy Makes you wonder why huh? Intel were planning the same thing apparently for their Atoms, they were originally to use the ancient Presscott Architecture but that idea was binned. They must figure that somehow these older processors are better for a Battery life > Performance machine, they mustn't take into account that the time people spend waiting for this slower CPU's roughly translates into the gain of battery life they squeeze out of a ancient architecture. I'm pretty sure that they would be better off using a more modern architecture at a lower voltage.
THEfog On 04/08/2010 9:27 PM, "Espionage724" <[email protected]> wrote: Never knew that much info about CPU's even existed... lol Thx ppls :) On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with you on al... -- Acer TravelMate 2480 GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz HDD: S... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
