I agree with you on all fronts :(

Celeron was okay, but Atom... (frustrated face here...).

The Neo, IMO, is worse. Specifically the one my HP DV2 shipped with. Not
only is it a single core, but unlike the other AMD CPU of the time (maybe
that is why they are called Neo?), it's based off of the ancient K8
architecture!! This architecture was retired once the Core 2 Duos came out,
c'mon... I know they were decent against the Pentium 4, but that's ancient
news, especially with the power draw of the stinking Neo CPU. What's worse?
The dual core version is based on the k10 microarchitecture, and is waaaay
more than twice as fast.

To save a slimey 50usd (promotional price) at the time, I shot myself in the
foot with a rebar gun (imagine a nail gun that shoots 3/4" iron rebar...).


Okay... maybe I shouldn't send this one out, lol...
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:13 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:

> No synthetic benchmarks, just real world apps, be it games or
> productivity apps.
>
> What really bums me out is that I thought the worse pos cpu in the
> world couldn't go lower, the celeron, but they had to go and create
> atom :S btw, isn't that amd neo something similar, being used in
> netbooks too?
>
> On Aug 4, 5:10 am, Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There was a Q7xxx line? Any ways, with the madhouse exception of the
> QX9xxx
> > series (they are capable of matching an i5 in many applications!!), the
> > Phenom II X4 9xx line matches up with the Q9xxx line, with the 965BE on
> top.
> > It depends if you are pursing synthetic benchmarks (some of which use
> > Intel's compiler - which helps optimise it for Intel CPU's instruction
> setup
> > process), or usage benchmarks.
> >
> > Of course, the AMD has already been solidly whooped in the mobile CPU
> > department, ever since the lga1156 platform went mobile (bringing with it
> > the i7 quads).
> >
>  > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:04 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Maybe Q7xxx or Q8xxx might be handled by Phenom II X4, but Q9xxx are
> > > not.
> > > And yes, it was time AMD launched new mobile cpus. I didn't like those
> > > turions just the same of those intel pentium dual cores launched.
> >
> > > On Aug 4, 2:46 am, Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Only the Intel quad +HT. Normal quads are handled by the Phenom II X4
> > > line.
> > > > Which, AMD just (finally, after the longest freakish wait) launhed
> their
> > > > Phenom II mobile line, and finally booted the last of the old K8
> (Athlon
> > > 64)
> > > > CPU architecture!!! (Phenom is K10, Phenom II is K10.5).
> >
> > >  > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:22 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Go with i5. When games fully use 6 cores, your computer will be out
> of
> > > > > date. Also, have in account that current amd 6 core cpus have
> similar
> > > > > performance to intel 4 core cpus, so that gives you an idea of the
> > > > > performance.
> >
> > > > > On Aug 4, 1:38 am, Namige <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Well let's just say gaming
> >
> > > > > > On Aug 3, 11:28 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > That depends. How many cores do you actually need? And what is
> the
> > > > > > > computer for?
> >
> > > > > > > On Aug 3, 5:12 pm, Namige <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Which is better. Phenom II x6 or Core i5?
> >
> > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 2:21 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Forgot to add amd cpus. Athlon II have great performance if
> you
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > > > to tinker around with them, Phenom II BE are the way to go
> when
> > > it
> > > > > > > > > comes about Amd. Their fusion technology is very
> interesting.
> > > But
> > > > > > > > > again, they have the same power/price relation with intel
> as
> > > Ati
> > > > > has
> > > > > > > > > with nvidia, meaning Intel costs more than Amd but is more
> > > > > powerful,
> > > > > > > > > Nvidia costs more than Ati but is also more powerful.
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 2:08 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Either get a really fast dual core like a E8400, or go
> for
> > > > > regular and
> > > > > > > > > > above quad cores like Q9400, but know that i7 is king of
> all.
> > > And
> > > > > > > > > > since having a fast cpu paired with a slow gpu will give
> you
> > > > > lower
> > > > > > > > > > performance, set minimum performance standards (after
> all,
> > > you
> > > > > want a
> > > > > > > > > > dramatically different experience from intel, right?)
> with
> > > > > acceptable
> > > > > > > > > > pricing range. Medium range gpus are your best bet. A
> nvidia
> > > > > GTX260 is
> > > > > > > > > > a medium to high end gpu that has plenty of horsepower
> and
> > > will
> > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > > you for years, or you can wait for price reductions on
> > > GTX460, if
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > really need dx11 support. You can also save a bit more
> and
> > > > > instead of
> > > > > > > > > > a GTX260 you can go for a GTS250. On ati side you can go
> with
> > > a
> > > > > HD
> > > > > > > > > > 4890, or a HD 5750 for dx11 support.
> > > > > > > > > > Nvidia 8SP/Ati 40SP is the nearest thing you have from
> intel,
> > > so
> > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > the thing you want to avoid the most. You have very cheap
> > > nvidias
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > 32SP that runs things at smooth fps if you set your game
> > > configs
> > > > > > > > > > right.
> > > > > > > > > > One last note, a better cpu isn't just a faster cpu by
> > > itself, it
> > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > speeds other components as well.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 8:56 am, Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > What to know? At least:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > dual core (no, a very fast single core will not cut it)
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > All of the below info is clock-rate dependant.
> > > > > > > > > > > ATi 40SP is good enough for any game at min settings at
> > > > > 1200x800... most of
> > > > > > > > > > > the time. It will not fail to run, but it is heavily
> > > limited in
> > > > > graphics
> > > > > > > > > > > settings, no matter what.
> > > > > > > > > > > ATi 80SP is good enough to max out nearly all games (no
> AA)
> > > at
> > > > > 1200x800, if
> > > > > > > > > > > clocked to 500MHz+
> > > > > > > > > > > ATi 400SP is good enough to run well at medium settings
> at
> > > > > 1600x1200
> > > > > > > > > > > ATi 800SP is good enough to run (depending on clocks)
> at
> > > max
> > > > > settings at
> > > > > > > > > > > 1080p
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > nVidia 8SP follows the same as ATi 40SP
> > > > > > > > > > > nVidia 16SP follows the same as ATi 80SP
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > That's all I know, all of it from empirical experience.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you!
> > > > > > > > > > > -Jeremy
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Espionage724 <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Espionage724
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Namige <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt they'll give you a newer model, they
> probably
> > > will
> > > > > give you a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > refubished one.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What's your gamertag?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 1:12 am, Espionage724 <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Sounds like me when I tried to make my 360 RROD so
> I
> > > could
> > > > > get a newer
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> model :p I tried shutting the fans off, closing
> the
> > > vents,
> > > > > putting a
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> hair dryer towards the vents, playing GTA IV,
> nothing
> > > I
> > > > > did killed it,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> and it still hasn't died :p
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Namige <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > There are many great laptops that Asus makes,
> but
> > > their
> > > > > design looks
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > shabby. Alienware Laptops are great, but their
> > > desktop
> > > > > counterparts
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > are ridiculously overpriced(Even more than
> Apple)
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > One more thing. I bought 4 year warranty for my
> Sony
> > > > > Vaio and it looks
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > like it is going to waste even though I've had
> my
> > > laptop
> > > > > for 3 and a
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > half years and also overclock my Laptop 30%
> since
> > > the
> > > > > past year and as
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > of now, it hasn't died on me. That's annoying. I
> > > want my
> > > > > laptop to die
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > so I can get a replacement!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Jul 29, 5:53 pm, hussam aulaian <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> when u buy a Machine
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 1- dont buy intel stuff
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 2- the GPU should be GDDR3 and above only ,
> dont
> > > even
> > > > > look at lower
> > > > > > > > > > > > stuff
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 3- Buy ASUS stuff as THEfog said , bcuz they
> are
> > > the
> > > > > best in the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Business
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> 4- dont get near :
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> a- Dell ( bad components used in their devices
> esp
> > > the
> > > > > Capacitors )
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> b- Foxconn ( one of the worst Motherboard ive
> seen
> > > so
> > > > > far)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> c- Fujitsu & Acer ( worst laptops i ever seen )
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> d- LG ( best vendor for home appliances but for
> > > sure
> > > > > dont buy their
> > > > > > > > > > > > laptops
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> worst warranty ever )
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> laptop vendors i recommend
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> A- hp ( price and good Hardware but dont get
> near
> > > their
> > > > > DV4 models
> > > > > > > > > > > > they hav
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> heat issues )
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> B- Toshiba (solid laptops that can handle alot
> )
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> C- ASUS ( ofcourse)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> B- Alienware
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Acer TravelMate 2480
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz
> RAM:
> > > 2GB
> > > > > DDR2 333Mhz
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>   HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA- Hide quoted
> text -
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > >  Acer TravelMate 2480
> > > > > > > > > > > > GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz
> RAM:
> > > 2GB
> > > > > DDR2 333Mhz
> > > > > > > > > > > >   HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >
> > > --
> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >
> >
>
> --
> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to