It hasn't been overlooked at all actually. When I was working on sigma 3.0 , I did research the H.A but nothing was indicating it was doing anything.
Also , while doing this research, I've found out that some opengl games required me to put the H.A to disabled giving it a bit more power. Oh and also, H.A registry key shouldn't be there ( at least for the 965 ) as it is set to Maximum by default ( with latest 1930 drivers ). If you use WDDM drivers tho its gonna be there and you can set it higher/lower in the Graphic properties of windows. On Sep 27, 6:10 pm, Rogério Queiroga <[email protected]> wrote: > For years that I've known about how changing hardware acceleration was meant > only for compatibility measures and general system stability. There were a > few games that also ran better (or even ran at all) when the acceleration > value was one tick below maximum, which I feel like it's the value we > currently have, but mainly games compatibility is affected by sound > acceleration. > > The value called "Acceleration.Level" is located on the already very known > addreg path :) both on > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Control\Class\{4D36E968-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}\0000 > and > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Control\Class\{4D36E968-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}\0001 > > One thing concerns me though. If there are 5 values and I have value 4, does > that mean that value 4 is full accel while 0 being disabled or 4 is one step > below maximum? But as far as I'm concerned, the info could be somewhat > reliable, with Acceleration.Level”=dword:00000001 being the disabled setting, > with 1-5 range. > > Well, intel igps are known for their lack of brute pixel pushing horsepower, > but still I see my measly GMA950 running more swiftly than many full grown > nvidia and ati gpus, which only shows the untapped potential of our hardware. > Also, it seems that 1930 driver release is still vista based, though this is > just a curiosity. > > > Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:58:05 -0700 > > Subject: [9xxssf] Re: Can this have been overlooked? > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > there is nothing more specific and exact than registry mode, thats one > > huge finding!!! > > > could you show me pls the way to get to that reg pls? ill give i try > > the ranges, by default DXDIAG shows the defual value at maximium, but > > thats probably like a legal-safe-stable-office-home-mom uses this > > computer-low performance-underated calsification, perhaps although its > > "at max" there is someway to make it higher, and surely it will > > increase the performance at least 3 or 4 FPS avarage. > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
