lol, yeah well, i may try some chipset driver update after this...still,
most hardware tweak already been done the first thing my system arrived on
my table./.lol

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 3:02 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:

> You amd/ati fellas... then you get surprised because of this and that
> that doesn't perform as expected... Well, I definitely recommend
> aftermarket chipset drivers, generic ones usually never fully perform.
> You can both get vendor's drivers (amd) or specialized drivers, which
> might not fit the things you do with that computer.
>
> On Oct 30, 7:57 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> > nah, amd, 770-C45 to be exact..
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:24 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Does your motherboard have an intel chipset?
> >
> > > On Oct 30, 5:53 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > speaking of which, i need an advice, my USB speed is much slower than
> my
> > > > laptop, on my laptop, i can maxed transfer speed up to 20mbps..while
> on
> > > > desktop, it maxed at 1 - 2mbps..lol..
> >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, AngelicTears <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > sort of imagining what would readyboost performance be if it use on
> a
> > > USB
> > > > > 3.0 bandwidth....
> >
> > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:49 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > >> If you're serious about using readyboost, you should get one that
> > > > >> either one or two tiers above that, like 9mb/s r/w, or go all out
> and
> > > > >> get something that does 20+ mb/s r/w
> >
> > > > >> On Oct 30, 5:48 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> > I tried testing it out and it seems like the read speed is
> 6.53mb/s
> > > > >> > and write speed is 1.66mb/s lol
> >
> > > > >> > On Oct 30, 9:40 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > It's cool, I just wanted to know if there were effective ways,
> but
> > > > >> > > thanks :)
> > > > >> > > What's the read/write speed of the flash device you're using
> for
> > > > >> > > readyboost?
> >
> > > > >> > > On Oct 30, 5:38 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > > There are some activation methods for you to bypass the
> online
> > > > >> > > > activation.
> > > > >> > > > ReadyBoost is a somewhat effective tool to have. It cut down
> my
> > > > >> > > > Photoshop CS5 loading time by a quarter and it seems to
> speed up
> > > > >> boot
> > > > >> > > > time by a couple seconds so that is always nice to have :).
> > > > >> > > > Obviously, I'm not allowed to Warez posts but if you want to
> > > know
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > links, I'll email ya lol
> >
> > > > >> > > > On Oct 30, 9:17 am, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > > > Damn, now you're getting me curious to try 2010 :S and it
> has
> > > to
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> > > > > the office, since readyboost really isn't optimized as it
> > > could,
> > > > >> trust
> > > > >> > > > > me as I used a flash device that topped usb 2.0 bandwidth.
> And
> > > > >> what's
> > > > >> > > > > that I hear about online activation?
> >
> > > > >> > > > > On Oct 30, 5:15 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > Well, Office 2010 RTM loads pretty fast, actually,
> almost
> > > > >> > > > > > instantaneously as a matter of fact. Well, it's either
> that
> > > or
> > > > >> > > > > > ReadyBoost on my 2gb USB is fricking awesome lol.
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > On Oct 30, 6:57 am, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > Well, 2007 loads quite slow for me, makes me miss 2003
> a
> > > lot
> > > > >> in that
> > > > >> > > > > > > matter. I'm still not sure, but at least 2010 also has
> the
> > > > >> classic
> > > > >> > > > > > > menu.
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > On Oct 30, 9:02 am, CHAMPION <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Is It Just Me Or Others Also Experience Speed
> Increase
> > > In
> > > > >> Loading File
> > > > >> > > > > > > > In 2010 Faster Than That 2007.............
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > For Me File Load Faster And Access At Low Memory In
> 2010
> > > &
> > > > >> better then
> > > > >> > > > > > > > 2007.............
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > So I Would Say MO2010 Is better then MO2007(for
> > > > >> me)..............
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:38 am, tribaljet <
> [email protected]>
> > > > >> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > After some time now, Office 2010 was launched, and
> I'm
> > > > >> curious if
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > anyone already tried it and noticed any visible
> > > > >> differences between
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2007 and 2010. I only switched to 2007 because of
> the
> > > > >> non-backwards
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > compatible 2007 format, and since 2010 doesn't
> bring
> > > that
> > > > >> bs again, I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > might not upgrade, unless there are tremendously
> more
> > > > >> powerful tools.
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Any takers?
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > P.S.: Don't even mention Libreoffice or I might
> burst
> > > into
> > > > >> laughter
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > and be unable to stop it ;P Whether we like it or
> not,
> > > > >> only the paid
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > office suits are worth it, both in compatibility
> > > between
> > > > >> different
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > brands, as well as formatting and learning curve,
> > > given
> > > > >> the similar
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > learning paths.
> >
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Laptop:
> > > > > Acer Aspire
> > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > > > > Intel 945 Chipset
> > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Laptop:
> > > > Acer Aspire
> > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > > > Intel 945 Chipset
> > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04
> >
> > > --
> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >
> > --
> > Laptop:
> > Acer Aspire
> > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > Intel 945 Chipset
> > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04
>
> --
> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>



-- 
Laptop:
Acer Aspire
Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
Intel GMA 950 IGP
Intel 945 Chipset
1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
80GB standard PATA HDD
Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to