sort of imagining what would readyboost performance be if it use on a USB 3.0 bandwidth....
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:49 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > If you're serious about using readyboost, you should get one that > either one or two tiers above that, like 9mb/s r/w, or go all out and > get something that does 20+ mb/s r/w > > On Oct 30, 5:48 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I tried testing it out and it seems like the read speed is 6.53mb/s > > and write speed is 1.66mb/s lol > > > > On Oct 30, 9:40 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It's cool, I just wanted to know if there were effective ways, but > > > thanks :) > > > What's the read/write speed of the flash device you're using for > > > readyboost? > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:38 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > There are some activation methods for you to bypass the online > > > > activation. > > > > ReadyBoost is a somewhat effective tool to have. It cut down my > > > > Photoshop CS5 loading time by a quarter and it seems to speed up boot > > > > time by a couple seconds so that is always nice to have :). > > > > Obviously, I'm not allowed to Warez posts but if you want to know the > > > > links, I'll email ya lol > > > > > > On Oct 30, 9:17 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Damn, now you're getting me curious to try 2010 :S and it has to be > > > > > the office, since readyboost really isn't optimized as it could, > trust > > > > > me as I used a flash device that topped usb 2.0 bandwidth. And > what's > > > > > that I hear about online activation? > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:15 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, Office 2010 RTM loads pretty fast, actually, almost > > > > > > instantaneously as a matter of fact. Well, it's either that or > > > > > > ReadyBoost on my 2gb USB is fricking awesome lol. > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 6:57 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Well, 2007 loads quite slow for me, makes me miss 2003 a lot in > that > > > > > > > matter. I'm still not sure, but at least 2010 also has the > classic > > > > > > > menu. > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 9:02 am, CHAMPION <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is It Just Me Or Others Also Experience Speed Increase In > Loading File > > > > > > > > In 2010 Faster Than That 2007............. > > > > > > > > > > For Me File Load Faster And Access At Low Memory In 2010 & > better then > > > > > > > > 2007............. > > > > > > > > > > So I Would Say MO2010 Is better then MO2007(for > me).............. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:38 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > After some time now, Office 2010 was launched, and I'm > curious if > > > > > > > > > anyone already tried it and noticed any visible differences > between > > > > > > > > > 2007 and 2010. I only switched to 2007 because of the > non-backwards > > > > > > > > > compatible 2007 format, and since 2010 doesn't bring that > bs again, I > > > > > > > > > might not upgrade, unless there are tremendously more > powerful tools. > > > > > > > > > > > Any takers? > > > > > > > > > > > P.S.: Don't even mention Libreoffice or I might burst into > laughter > > > > > > > > > and be unable to stop it ;P Whether we like it or not, only > the paid > > > > > > > > > office suits are worth it, both in compatibility between > different > > > > > > > > > brands, as well as formatting and learning curve, given the > similar > > > > > > > > > learning paths. > > > > > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Laptop: Acer Aspire Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz Intel GMA 950 IGP Intel 945 Chipset 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 80GB standard PATA HDD Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
