Damn, google groups is acting up again here, not updating msgs. Chipset driver update should set things right. Also, check if all ports are functioning properly, if hi speed wasn't disabled by some cmos fault, etc.
On Oct 30, 8:06 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > lol, yeah well, i may try some chipset driver update after this...still, > most hardware tweak already been done the first thing my system arrived on > my table./.lol > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 3:02 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > You amd/ati fellas... then you get surprised because of this and that > > that doesn't perform as expected... Well, I definitely recommend > > aftermarket chipset drivers, generic ones usually never fully perform. > > You can both get vendor's drivers (amd) or specialized drivers, which > > might not fit the things you do with that computer. > > > On Oct 30, 7:57 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > nah, amd, 770-C45 to be exact.. > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:24 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Does your motherboard have an intel chipset? > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:53 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > speaking of which, i need an advice, my USB speed is much slower than > > my > > > > > laptop, on my laptop, i can maxed transfer speed up to 20mbps..while > > on > > > > > desktop, it maxed at 1 - 2mbps..lol.. > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > sort of imagining what would readyboost performance be if it use on > > a > > > > USB > > > > > > 3.0 bandwidth.... > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:49 AM, tribaljet <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> If you're serious about using readyboost, you should get one that > > > > > >> either one or two tiers above that, like 9mb/s r/w, or go all out > > and > > > > > >> get something that does 20+ mb/s r/w > > > > > > >> On Oct 30, 5:48 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > I tried testing it out and it seems like the read speed is > > 6.53mb/s > > > > > >> > and write speed is 1.66mb/s lol > > > > > > >> > On Oct 30, 9:40 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > It's cool, I just wanted to know if there were effective ways, > > but > > > > > >> > > thanks :) > > > > > >> > > What's the read/write speed of the flash device you're using > > for > > > > > >> > > readyboost? > > > > > > >> > > On Oct 30, 5:38 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > There are some activation methods for you to bypass the > > online > > > > > >> > > > activation. > > > > > >> > > > ReadyBoost is a somewhat effective tool to have. It cut down > > my > > > > > >> > > > Photoshop CS5 loading time by a quarter and it seems to > > speed up > > > > > >> boot > > > > > >> > > > time by a couple seconds so that is always nice to have :). > > > > > >> > > > Obviously, I'm not allowed to Warez posts but if you want to > > > > know > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > > > links, I'll email ya lol > > > > > > >> > > > On Oct 30, 9:17 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > Damn, now you're getting me curious to try 2010 :S and it > > has > > > > to > > > > > >> be > > > > > >> > > > > the office, since readyboost really isn't optimized as it > > > > could, > > > > > >> trust > > > > > >> > > > > me as I used a flash device that topped usb 2.0 bandwidth. > > And > > > > > >> what's > > > > > >> > > > > that I hear about online activation? > > > > > > >> > > > > On Oct 30, 5:15 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > Well, Office 2010 RTM loads pretty fast, actually, > > almost > > > > > >> > > > > > instantaneously as a matter of fact. Well, it's either > > that > > > > or > > > > > >> > > > > > ReadyBoost on my 2gb USB is fricking awesome lol. > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Oct 30, 6:57 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Well, 2007 loads quite slow for me, makes me miss 2003 > > a > > > > lot > > > > > >> in that > > > > > >> > > > > > > matter. I'm still not sure, but at least 2010 also has > > the > > > > > >> classic > > > > > >> > > > > > > menu. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Oct 30, 9:02 am, CHAMPION <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is It Just Me Or Others Also Experience Speed > > Increase > > > > In > > > > > >> Loading File > > > > > >> > > > > > > > In 2010 Faster Than That 2007............. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > For Me File Load Faster And Access At Low Memory In > > 2010 > > > > & > > > > > >> better then > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2007............. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > So I Would Say MO2010 Is better then MO2007(for > > > > > >> me).............. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:38 am, tribaljet < > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > After some time now, Office 2010 was launched, and > > I'm > > > > > >> curious if > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > anyone already tried it and noticed any visible > > > > > >> differences between > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2007 and 2010. I only switched to 2007 because of > > the > > > > > >> non-backwards > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > compatible 2007 format, and since 2010 doesn't > > bring > > > > that > > > > > >> bs again, I > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > might not upgrade, unless there are tremendously > > more > > > > > >> powerful tools. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Any takers? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > P.S.: Don't even mention Libreoffice or I might > > burst > > > > into > > > > > >> laughter > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > and be unable to stop it ;P Whether we like it or > > not, > > > > > >> only the paid > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > office suits are worth it, both in compatibility > > > > between > > > > > >> different > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > brands, as well as formatting and learning curve, > > > > given > > > > > >> the similar > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > learning paths. > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Laptop: > > > > > > Acer Aspire > > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > > -- > > > > > Laptop: > > > > > Acer Aspire > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > -- > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > > Laptop: > > > Acer Aspire > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Laptop: > Acer Aspire > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > Intel GMA 950 IGP > Intel 945 Chipset > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > 80GB standard PATA HDD > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
