As Dar As I Know Of Intel Mother Board I.E Mine Not All USB Port Support Usb 2.0 Speed BUS Support.........
http://i54.tinypic.com/25r2ez8.jpg Check In URS Which Port Support USB 2.0 And Use That......... On Oct 31, 12:06 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > lol, yeah well, i may try some chipset driver update after this...still, > most hardware tweak already been done the first thing my system arrived on > my table./.lol > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 3:02 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > You amd/ati fellas... then you get surprised because of this and that > > that doesn't perform as expected... Well, I definitely recommend > > aftermarket chipset drivers, generic ones usually never fully perform. > > You can both get vendor's drivers (amd) or specialized drivers, which > > might not fit the things you do with that computer. > > > On Oct 30, 7:57 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > nah, amd, 770-C45 to be exact.. > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:24 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Does your motherboard have an intel chipset? > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:53 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > speaking of which, i need an advice, my USB speed is much slower than > > my > > > > > laptop, on my laptop, i can maxed transfer speed up to 20mbps..while > > on > > > > > desktop, it maxed at 1 - 2mbps..lol.. > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > sort of imagining what would readyboost performance be if it use on > > a > > > > USB > > > > > > 3.0 bandwidth.... > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:49 AM, tribaljet <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> If you're serious about using readyboost, you should get one that > > > > > >> either one or two tiers above that, like 9mb/s r/w, or go all out > > and > > > > > >> get something that does 20+ mb/s r/w > > > > > > >> On Oct 30, 5:48 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > I tried testing it out and it seems like the read speed is > > 6.53mb/s > > > > > >> > and write speed is 1.66mb/s lol > > > > > > >> > On Oct 30, 9:40 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > It's cool, I just wanted to know if there were effective ways, > > but > > > > > >> > > thanks :) > > > > > >> > > What's the read/write speed of the flash device you're using > > for > > > > > >> > > readyboost? > > > > > > >> > > On Oct 30, 5:38 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > There are some activation methods for you to bypass the > > online > > > > > >> > > > activation. > > > > > >> > > > ReadyBoost is a somewhat effective tool to have. It cut down > > my > > > > > >> > > > Photoshop CS5 loading time by a quarter and it seems to > > speed up > > > > > >> boot > > > > > >> > > > time by a couple seconds so that is always nice to have :). > > > > > >> > > > Obviously, I'm not allowed to Warez posts but if you want to > > > > know > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > > > links, I'll email ya lol > > > > > > >> > > > On Oct 30, 9:17 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > Damn, now you're getting me curious to try 2010 :S and it > > has > > > > to > > > > > >> be > > > > > >> > > > > the office, since readyboost really isn't optimized as it > > > > could, > > > > > >> trust > > > > > >> > > > > me as I used a flash device that topped usb 2.0 bandwidth. > > And > > > > > >> what's > > > > > >> > > > > that I hear about online activation? > > > > > > >> > > > > On Oct 30, 5:15 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > Well, Office 2010 RTM loads pretty fast, actually, > > almost > > > > > >> > > > > > instantaneously as a matter of fact. Well, it's either > > that > > > > or > > > > > >> > > > > > ReadyBoost on my 2gb USB is fricking awesome lol. > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Oct 30, 6:57 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Well, 2007 loads quite slow for me, makes me miss 2003 > > a > > > > lot > > > > > >> in that > > > > > >> > > > > > > matter. I'm still not sure, but at least 2010 also has > > the > > > > > >> classic > > > > > >> > > > > > > menu. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Oct 30, 9:02 am, CHAMPION <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is It Just Me Or Others Also Experience Speed > > Increase > > > > In > > > > > >> Loading File > > > > > >> > > > > > > > In 2010 Faster Than That 2007............. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > For Me File Load Faster And Access At Low Memory In > > 2010 > > > > & > > > > > >> better then > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2007............. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > So I Would Say MO2010 Is better then MO2007(for > > > > > >> me).............. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 5:38 am, tribaljet < > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > After some time now, Office 2010 was launched, and > > I'm > > > > > >> curious if > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > anyone already tried it and noticed any visible > > > > > >> differences between > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2007 and 2010. I only switched to 2007 because of > > the > > > > > >> non-backwards > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > compatible 2007 format, and since 2010 doesn't > > bring > > > > that > > > > > >> bs again, I > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > might not upgrade, unless there are tremendously > > more > > > > > >> powerful tools. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Any takers? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > P.S.: Don't even mention Libreoffice or I might > > burst > > > > into > > > > > >> laughter > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > and be unable to stop it ;P Whether we like it or > > not, > > > > > >> only the paid > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > office suits are worth it, both in compatibility > > > > between > > > > > >> different > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > brands, as well as formatting and learning curve, > > > > given > > > > > >> the similar > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > learning paths. > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Laptop: > > > > > > Acer Aspire > > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > > -- > > > > > Laptop: > > > > > Acer Aspire > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > -- > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > > Laptop: > > > Acer Aspire > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Laptop: > Acer Aspire > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > Intel GMA 950 IGP > Intel 945 Chipset > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > 80GB standard PATA HDD > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
