I do read all the updates as they reach my inbox. But it is easy to get skewed between life and the multi days worth of digests a long thread can spam. I've not called anybody names. I've been perfectly civil, so am unsure what you are referring to. If its in reference to the mis-understanding where I jokingly called America a third world country in reference to its infrastructure a few months back. I already apologised back then.
Now please, could you ease up a little on the aggression :-( On Jan 8, 8:53 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > That's why previous posts are to be read, and not jump in and just > start writing. You better think things straight before you start > calling other people names. I answered accordingly. But don't worry, > like I said, I don't take any merit to the D2X sound quality, just > that it's too expensive, and not suited for games at all, overall > doesn't seem like a good choice for the matter discussed before all > this talk between you and me. > > MAD, I tried that thing in the past, but it's really a crutch, and it > degrades audio much more than you can imagine, it's just the brain > that initially processes the audio changes as being better, but > they're far from it. And I don't know where you get that you're old :D > Crazy? Yes, but not old ;) We were just discussing about different > soundcards. Also, that does take cycles that our 9xx chipsets can't > really afford to spare, but mainly the real issue is that is degrades > the audio signal in ways that are just not desired. If using only > onboard sound, better use the tools your chipset provides as they are > already in use, though the less you mess with onboard EQ, the better. > > On 8 Jan, 07:46, Nin-lil-izi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I guess the fanguy really likes his sound card :-) > > Chill, there is no need to be so militant. I was just offering my > > dissenting opinion not asking for abuse. > > I frankly find your attitude offensive. > > > I never realised anybody was asking for suggestions for a laptop, I > > thought it was about sound cards in general. > > It is hard to keep track of where a thread is going when you only get > > a few posts a time out of a few threads in your inbox. and a > > discussion gets fragmented into numerous little blocks split between > > emails over a random period. > > > On Jan 8, 8:15 am, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > i dont know what you guys talikng about im TOO OLD to read that much > > > all i see i sound software and sound cards... correct me if im wrong > > > > IM GOING TO RECOMMEND TO YOU SRS SANDBOX 5.1 its a virtual SOUND CARD > > > it really improves the performance and quality of sound of the PCI > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
