Hum. I get the updates too, but I have 9xxssf always open, but I understand why you weren't following the thread. I don't take it well when there is a hint of being a fan of this or that, I merely state the facts, whether I like them or not. That was the reference I was talking about, not that you were talking about, which was quite some time ago, and as far as I recall, things were solved back then.
I didn't want to come as aggressive, but like I said that I don't really take it so well when there are insinuations. I like things out in the open. I'm sorry if I sounded harsh. Ok, how about you sharing some thoughts with MAD_BEAST as to why he shouldn't use SRS Audio Sandbox? :) On 8 Jan, 08:36, Nin-lil-izi <[email protected]> wrote: > I do read all the updates as they reach my inbox. But it is easy to > get skewed between life and the multi days worth of digests a long > thread can spam. > I've not called anybody names. I've been perfectly civil, so am unsure > what you are referring to. > If its in reference to the mis-understanding where I jokingly called > America a third world country in reference to its infrastructure a few > months back. I already apologised back then. > > Now please, could you ease up a little on the aggression :-( > > On Jan 8, 8:53 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That's why previous posts are to be read, and not jump in and just > > start writing. You better think things straight before you start > > calling other people names. I answered accordingly. But don't worry, > > like I said, I don't take any merit to the D2X sound quality, just > > that it's too expensive, and not suited for games at all, overall > > doesn't seem like a good choice for the matter discussed before all > > this talk between you and me. > > > MAD, I tried that thing in the past, but it's really a crutch, and it > > degrades audio much more than you can imagine, it's just the brain > > that initially processes the audio changes as being better, but > > they're far from it. And I don't know where you get that you're old :D > > Crazy? Yes, but not old ;) We were just discussing about different > > soundcards. Also, that does take cycles that our 9xx chipsets can't > > really afford to spare, but mainly the real issue is that is degrades > > the audio signal in ways that are just not desired. If using only > > onboard sound, better use the tools your chipset provides as they are > > already in use, though the less you mess with onboard EQ, the better. > > > On 8 Jan, 07:46, Nin-lil-izi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I guess the fanguy really likes his sound card :-) > > > Chill, there is no need to be so militant. I was just offering my > > > dissenting opinion not asking for abuse. > > > I frankly find your attitude offensive. > > > > I never realised anybody was asking for suggestions for a laptop, I > > > thought it was about sound cards in general. > > > It is hard to keep track of where a thread is going when you only get > > > a few posts a time out of a few threads in your inbox. and a > > > discussion gets fragmented into numerous little blocks split between > > > emails over a random period. > > > > On Jan 8, 8:15 am, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > i dont know what you guys talikng about im TOO OLD to read that much > > > > all i see i sound software and sound cards... correct me if im wrong > > > > > IM GOING TO RECOMMEND TO YOU SRS SANDBOX 5.1 its a virtual SOUND CARD > > > > it really improves the performance and quality of sound of the PCI > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
