I hope your head didn't hurt much after knocking on the night stand,
as farcry on ultra settings over 25fps at that resolution with a GMA
950 is kind of a joke :)) And if the game is patched to the latest
version, it gets SM3 support, not to mention the high res textures, so
I think you might be still dreaming and posting here, which is a not
so recommendable mix.

On 22 Mar, 16:58, shivam <[email protected]> wrote:
> dont know about other games.....but far cry....lol i can play it on
> 1280x1024 at ultra high settings with over 25 fps all time on my gma
> 950......u should have better results as u have 965,ohh remember to
> patch the game....
>
> On Mar 20, 8:29 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Looking around the 9xx scene, including Youtube, I'm seeing one thing
> > that is bothering me greatly. Anything that runs is being listed as
> > "works". 12fps is "playable". Can we get some sort of standard for
> > compatibility lists and such? Some examples:
>
> > My laptop's a 1.66ghz C2D. I'm using an Intel 965/X3100 with Alpha 2,
> > I believe. I have 2gb RAM and am running Windows 7
>
> > Dead Rising 2: Not playable. Not, in any way, playable. Will run at
> > 2fps on a beefy machine with an Intel 965. Don't even waste your time.
> > I've seen this game listed as WORKING by people and that needs to stop
> > (didn't actually test myself).
>
> > Dead Space 2: Works. 8-12 FPS on my machine with 640x480, tweaking and
> > Alpha.
>
> > Far Cry: Playable. Good example of a playable game: It'll run at a
> > nice smooth framerate at low settings, and is pushable to medium. I'm
> > about halfway through the game and running on 800x600 at Medium, and
> > it looks absolutely great. There's a room I'm in now with 20+ light
> > sources that I'm going to end up dropping to Low again on, though.
>
> > Unreal Tournament 2000: Perfect. Runs at max framerate. No issues at
> > all. Will not stutter or lag. You should probably use the DirectX 9
> > renderer you can google for, not the internal 7 or the 10/11 plugins
> > floating around.
>
> > Now, there are other games that I have the feeling should.. kind of be
> > in a special category.
>
> > You've seen the videos.
>
> > GTA4 X3100 30FPS L@@K! and you click, and it looks worse than GTA3
> > did. They've dialed it down to 320x240, disabled pedestrians, disabled
> > the sky, and tweaked it so heavily there's barely a game there. But it
> > is a game, and it is playable. I just wouldn't want to wish it on
> > anyone.
>
>

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to