Well it's not easy to compare our gmas to ordinary dedicated cards, since our cards weren't built for gaming pourposes (despite what INtel says..). for example if you have the possibility to install Prince of Persia Sands Of Time (the one from the trilogy), you will notice that the game performs quite well in most areas (as you would expect from a game so old) but when it comes to foggy areas and sand effects that's another story, modded drivers made a lot to solve this, but I still believe that those particular effects (and shadows too) are not well held at hardware level ( please modders correct me... please... please...). On the other hand we are actually able to run a game like Assassin's Creed which was known to be a pretty demanding game at the time it came out (do you know of any other graphic card that handle both PoP SoT and Starcraft 2 @15-20fps all minimum? I sometimes think that INtel locked fps on the card just to make us go crazy). That's why we usually advice to try demos when you can, or at least "borrow the game from a green friend" before buying it. Finally I guess the best is yet to come, if what our brother Angelic says is right, Sherry 1.3 will bring the performance level to 550% yes 550% from stock INtel drivers so who knows what the future wil deserve? (for example I hope I'll be able to play Alice:Madness Returns in a decent way even if all on low... I honestly don't care for graphics =) ) PS don't trust notebookcheck, they don't use neither MD nor IGRM =)
On 13 Apr, 05:54, Shiny <[email protected]> wrote: > Just how powerful is the Intel 950 if modded to maximum? Like a > comparison between a certain graphics card -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
