Haha thanks Angelic! Your not wrong. Your always right! :D On Apr 13, 10:16 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > In some other way, it is...th performance of Shader Model 2 graphics of both > GMA950 and x3100 is almost identical.. > what GMA950 looses to X3100 is that in fact X3100 can support Shader Model 3 > hardware wise...in comparison that GMA950 cant support Shader Model 3... > the fact that in performance, GMA950 surpass the GeForce 5 series even the 6 > series, but in term of support and compatibility, other Graphics are far > superior to GMA950... > again we cant compare graphics performance of IGP class such as the 950 to > other dedicated such as GeForce series, but we can compare other IGP such as > GeForce Mobile or similar :) > again correct me if im wrong... > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Shiny <[email protected]> wrote: > > So the 950 can be as powerful as the base X3100? (Not modded X3100) > > > On Apr 13, 1:54 am, Zentradis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well it's not easy to compare our gmas to ordinary dedicated cards, > > > since our cards weren't built for gaming pourposes (despite what INtel > > > says..). for example if you have the possibility to install Prince of > > > Persia Sands Of Time (the one from the trilogy), you will notice that > > > the game performs quite well in most areas (as you would expect from a > > > game so old) but when it comes to foggy areas and sand effects that's > > > another story, modded drivers made a lot to solve this, but I still > > > believe that those particular effects (and shadows too) are not well > > > held at hardware level ( please modders correct me... please... > > > please...). > > > On the other hand we are actually able to run a game like Assassin's > > > Creed which was known to be a pretty demanding game at the time it > > > came out (do you know of any other graphic card that handle both PoP > > > SoT and Starcraft 2 @15-20fps all minimum? I sometimes think that > > > INtel locked fps on the card just to make us go crazy). That's why we > > > usually advice to try demos when you can, or at least "borrow the game > > > from a green friend" before buying it. Finally I guess the best is yet > > > to come, if what our brother Angelic says is right, Sherry 1.3 will > > > bring the performance level to 550% yes 550% from stock INtel drivers > > > so who knows what the future wil deserve? > > > (for example I hope I'll be able to play Alice:Madness Returns in a > > > decent way even if all on low... I honestly don't care for graphics > > > =) ) > > > PS don't trust notebookcheck, they don't use neither MD nor IGRM =) > > > > On 13 Apr, 05:54, Shiny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Just how powerful is the Intel 950 if modded to maximum? Like a > > > > comparison between a certain graphics card > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
