So the 950 can be as powerful as the base X3100? (Not modded X3100) On Apr 13, 1:54 am, Zentradis <[email protected]> wrote: > Well it's not easy to compare our gmas to ordinary dedicated cards, > since our cards weren't built for gaming pourposes (despite what INtel > says..). for example if you have the possibility to install Prince of > Persia Sands Of Time (the one from the trilogy), you will notice that > the game performs quite well in most areas (as you would expect from a > game so old) but when it comes to foggy areas and sand effects that's > another story, modded drivers made a lot to solve this, but I still > believe that those particular effects (and shadows too) are not well > held at hardware level ( please modders correct me... please... > please...). > On the other hand we are actually able to run a game like Assassin's > Creed which was known to be a pretty demanding game at the time it > came out (do you know of any other graphic card that handle both PoP > SoT and Starcraft 2 @15-20fps all minimum? I sometimes think that > INtel locked fps on the card just to make us go crazy). That's why we > usually advice to try demos when you can, or at least "borrow the game > from a green friend" before buying it. Finally I guess the best is yet > to come, if what our brother Angelic says is right, Sherry 1.3 will > bring the performance level to 550% yes 550% from stock INtel drivers > so who knows what the future wil deserve? > (for example I hope I'll be able to play Alice:Madness Returns in a > decent way even if all on low... I honestly don't care for graphics > =) ) > PS don't trust notebookcheck, they don't use neither MD nor IGRM =) > > On 13 Apr, 05:54, Shiny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just how powerful is the Intel 950 if modded to maximum? Like a > > comparison between a certain graphics card
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
