I say realistic entirely because of the style gameplay versus other shooters. For example, fun shooters generally tend to involve bunnyhopping, taking rockets to the face, and weapons that require 40kb guides to explain. Realistic ones (the ones I stay away from) have features like jumping being scary when you're going over five feet, single bullets being capable of killing someone, and taking three shots to the torso being dangerous. :p Stalker's got psychic mutants throwing energy balls at you at one point and invisible horrible Cthulhus, but it plays like the latter.
(RIP fun shooters: you will be missed) On Apr 27, 3:43 am, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote: > Realistic Shooter? Get Battlefield 2 Realism or get Hidden & Dangerous 2. My > first and best FPS/TPS game ever. Of course, BF2 won't run on gma950 and > none of them are RPG, but H&D2 has inventory system and rank system and you > get a large map to do whatever you want, however you want :P > Like I said, good game, but not RPG. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:27 AM, shivam <[email protected]> wrote: > > @ all:stalker isn't good for a multiplayer.........great experience if > > u play single player.....i never played multiplayer(that doesn't mean > > i have pirated version),but i was so lost in single > > player.....exploring new areas and meeting new mutants,npcs,.....i was > > such amazed how good a game can be......i have completed all three > > games over 50 times now......and still playing....;) > > > On Apr 27, 7:30 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > it owns pretty hard, though certain guns are kind of overpowered! > > > > the levelling system in multiplayer's weird. There's money so you have > > > to buy guns before each spawn, and you can only buy things of the same > > > or lower level as you (for example, you can't buy a Tunder off the > > > bat, it's level 3) > > > > On Apr 26, 9:56 pm, 0_0face <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Then is Call of pripyat then!. WHAT?! THERE'S MULTIPLAYER!? > > > > > why did i din't know that. :(( > > > > > On Apr 27, 8:22 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > replying to self to say: Don't play Clear Sky. Don't do it. Don't > > > > > touch it, don't play it. Clear Sky is the worst game in the series by > > > > > a large margin, with some INTENSE problems. SHoC I never had any > > buggy > > > > > troubles with and CoP is stable. > > > > > > On Apr 26, 7:10 pm, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, yeah, but setting up XP on a laptop that won't recognize the > > > > > > hard drive is difficult to the point of frustration. > > > > > > > Shiny, if you like realistic shooters with an inventory system and > > > > > > radiation mutants, buy this game. It is not Fallout 3 or much like > > it > > > > > > in any way. > > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47058FHI2skthisisadudeowning > > > > > > people (pictured: ownage) with the worst equips in the game. It's > > also > > > > > > a pretty fun game in multiplayer, with an equipment system and > > > > > > anomalies lying around. > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 5:55 pm, "Jose Villegas (MADBEAST)" < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Only have played Stalker Shadows of Chernobyl and it runs better > > on > > > > > > > XP than WIN7. > > > > > > > > tested on both > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
