RIP fun shooters??? What exactly do you think Painkiller, Serious Sam, Duke Nukem, Timeshift, etc, are??? Both realistic and fun shooters are "fun" :) Maybe some people like only one genre but I do like both. Curiously, I still have to play Stalker series, mainly because I want to play it with full graphics and resolution, call me a greedy bastard if you will :)))
On 27 Abr, 08:53, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > I say realistic entirely because of the style gameplay versus other > shooters. For example, fun shooters generally tend to involve > bunnyhopping, taking rockets to the face, and weapons that require > 40kb guides to explain. Realistic ones (the ones I stay away from) > have features like jumping being scary when you're going over five > feet, single bullets being capable of killing someone, and taking > three shots to the torso being dangerous. :p Stalker's got psychic > mutants throwing energy balls at you at one point and invisible > horrible Cthulhus, but it plays like the latter. > > (RIP fun shooters: you will be missed) > > On Apr 27, 3:43 am, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Realistic Shooter? Get Battlefield 2 Realism or get Hidden & Dangerous 2. My > > first and best FPS/TPS game ever. Of course, BF2 won't run on gma950 and > > none of them are RPG, but H&D2 has inventory system and rank system and you > > get a large map to do whatever you want, however you want :P > > Like I said, good game, but not RPG. > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:27 AM, shivam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > @ all:stalker isn't good for a multiplayer.........great experience if > > > u play single player.....i never played multiplayer(that doesn't mean > > > i have pirated version),but i was so lost in single > > > player.....exploring new areas and meeting new mutants,npcs,.....i was > > > such amazed how good a game can be......i have completed all three > > > games over 50 times now......and still playing....;) > > > > On Apr 27, 7:30 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > it owns pretty hard, though certain guns are kind of overpowered! > > > > > the levelling system in multiplayer's weird. There's money so you have > > > > to buy guns before each spawn, and you can only buy things of the same > > > > or lower level as you (for example, you can't buy a Tunder off the > > > > bat, it's level 3) > > > > > On Apr 26, 9:56 pm, 0_0face <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Then is Call of pripyat then!. WHAT?! THERE'S MULTIPLAYER!? > > > > > > why did i din't know that. :(( > > > > > > On Apr 27, 8:22 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > replying to self to say: Don't play Clear Sky. Don't do it. Don't > > > > > > touch it, don't play it. Clear Sky is the worst game in the series > > > > > > by > > > > > > a large margin, with some INTENSE problems. SHoC I never had any > > > buggy > > > > > > troubles with and CoP is stable. > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 7:10 pm, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yeah, yeah, but setting up XP on a laptop that won't recognize the > > > > > > > hard drive is difficult to the point of frustration. > > > > > > > > Shiny, if you like realistic shooters with an inventory system and > > > > > > > radiation mutants, buy this game. It is not Fallout 3 or much like > > > it > > > > > > > in any way. > > > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47058FHI2skthisisadudeowning > > > > > > > people (pictured: ownage) with the worst equips in the game. It's > > > also > > > > > > > a pretty fun game in multiplayer, with an equipment system and > > > > > > > anomalies lying around. > > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 5:55 pm, "Jose Villegas (MADBEAST)" < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Only have played Stalker Shadows of Chernobyl and it runs > > > > > > > > better > > > on > > > > > > > > XP than WIN7. > > > > > > > > > tested on both > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
