Yeah, OF is a nice shooter, pretty realistic, but NOT the most realistic. On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:51 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given that there is a 2011 Painkiller game, and Bulletstorm made by > the same developers, I don't know about old :) And yes, I'm very > curious about SS3:BFE. Timeshift is an interesting concept with an > underdog of an engine, recommended, specially for multiplayer, if you > like Unreal Tournament. > > On 27 Abr, 20:47, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > Painkiller's 7 years old now so I'm not exactly counting it as > > current, I have no idea if Duke Nukem will live up to what it used to > > be, and I don't know how Serious Sam 3: BFE will be. I haven't played > > Timeshift, though > > > > I just miss when levels were incredibly quick and enemies were > > interesting, not Yet Another American Boogeyman With An AK-47. A > > scattering of these games are fun, when they're done right, but... I > > don't think anything's gonna compare to Unreal Tournament. > > > > On Apr 27, 5:17 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RIP fun shooters??? What exactly do you think Painkiller, Serious Sam, > > > Duke Nukem, Timeshift, etc, are??? > > > Both realistic and fun shooters are "fun" :) Maybe some people like > > > only one genre but I do like both. Curiously, I still have to play > > > Stalker series, mainly because I want to play it with full graphics > > > and resolution, call me a greedy bastard if you will :))) > > > > > On 27 Abr, 08:53, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I say realistic entirely because of the style gameplay versus other > > > > shooters. For example, fun shooters generally tend to involve > > > > bunnyhopping, taking rockets to the face, and weapons that require > > > > 40kb guides to explain. Realistic ones (the ones I stay away from) > > > > have features like jumping being scary when you're going over five > > > > feet, single bullets being capable of killing someone, and taking > > > > three shots to the torso being dangerous. :p Stalker's got psychic > > > > mutants throwing energy balls at you at one point and invisible > > > > horrible Cthulhus, but it plays like the latter. > > > > > > (RIP fun shooters: you will be missed) > > > > > > On Apr 27, 3:43 am, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Realistic Shooter? Get Battlefield 2 Realism or get Hidden & > Dangerous 2. My > > > > > first and best FPS/TPS game ever. Of course, BF2 won't run on > gma950 and > > > > > none of them are RPG, but H&D2 has inventory system and rank system > and you > > > > > get a large map to do whatever you want, however you want :P > > > > > Like I said, good game, but not RPG. > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:27 AM, shivam <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > @ all:stalker isn't good for a multiplayer.........great > experience if > > > > > > u play single player.....i never played multiplayer(that doesn't > mean > > > > > > i have pirated version),but i was so lost in single > > > > > > player.....exploring new areas and meeting new > mutants,npcs,.....i was > > > > > > such amazed how good a game can be......i have completed all > three > > > > > > games over 50 times now......and still playing....;) > > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 7:30 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > it owns pretty hard, though certain guns are kind of > overpowered! > > > > > > > > > the levelling system in multiplayer's weird. There's money so > you have > > > > > > > to buy guns before each spawn, and you can only buy things of > the same > > > > > > > or lower level as you (for example, you can't buy a Tunder off > the > > > > > > > bat, it's level 3) > > > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 9:56 pm, 0_0face <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Then is Call of pripyat then!. WHAT?! THERE'S MULTIPLAYER!? > > > > > > > > > > why did i din't know that. :(( > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 8:22 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > replying to self to say: Don't play Clear Sky. Don't do it. > Don't > > > > > > > > > touch it, don't play it. Clear Sky is the worst game in the > series by > > > > > > > > > a large margin, with some INTENSE problems. SHoC I never > had any > > > > > > buggy > > > > > > > > > troubles with and CoP is stable. > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 7:10 pm, arcane cossack <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, yeah, but setting up XP on a laptop that won't > recognize the > > > > > > > > > > hard drive is difficult to the point of frustration. > > > > > > > > > > > > Shiny, if you like realistic shooters with an inventory > system and > > > > > > > > > > radiation mutants, buy this game. It is not Fallout 3 or > much like > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > in any way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47058FHI2skthisisadudeowning > > > > > > > > > > people (pictured: ownage) with the worst equips in the > game. It's > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > a pretty fun game in multiplayer, with an equipment > system and > > > > > > > > > > anomalies lying around. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 5:55 pm, "Jose Villegas (MADBEAST)" < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only have played Stalker Shadows of Chernobyl and it > runs better > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > XP than WIN7. > > > > > > > > > > > > > tested on both > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
