Hey Group! Lately I've been trying to track down why networks that should be fast, aren't.
The support people at the ends don't have a lot of experience. My biggest problem usually turns out to be a duplex mismatch. But - my experience with Intermapper isn't great on this one. It seems that sometimes (often enough) that Intermapper disagrees with the device. I know Dartware will say: "We're just reporting back what the device says", but when I telnet to the device (mostly Cisco and HP switches) and look at the interface it says something different. So, I just want to confirm if you guys see the same as I do. When looking at the interface and you see "100 MBit" - does that means half duplex? As opposed to "100 MBit FD" - which presumably is full duplex. So if the "FD" isn't there Intermapper is saying that it is half duplex. Like negative option billing, if it doesn't say FD then its HD?? I would rather see an HD. Anybody else have experience with confusing Duplex indications from Intermapper? (I still want to talk about promiscuous mode - but that can wait) Kevin ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
