I'll second that. Actually, I'd like to be able to do lots of things from the device list: Managing/changing notifications, changing probe type, changing poll interval, etc. I don't see any reason why we shouldn't be able to do anything we can do from the individual maps (with the except moving devices around a map, of course).
Please consider this a feature request. It would GREATLY enhance Intermapper's ability to manage large numbers of devices... Tim Huffman Director of Engineering BOB - Business Only Broadband, LLC O (630) 590-6012 C (630) 340-1925 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.bobbroadband.com ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ashe, James P. Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:32 AM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: [IM-Talk] RE: Setting up Notifications across multiple maps I also believe this would be useful, as I've tried to do this - and wish I actually could. Please consider this an official request for product enhancement! James P. Ashe Systems Analyst 2 East Tennessee State University Office of Information Technology 4 2 3 * 4 3 9 * 4 6 4 8 From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luzadder, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:20 AM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: Setting up Notifications across multiple maps We have several different maps, with many devices obviously across all of those maps. (over 300 routers, switches, servers, etc..) I would like to set up notifications for all these devices, but going to each map (we have over two dozen "host group" maps that we drill down through a main map) is very slow and tedius. I thought by going to the DEVICE LIST, which shows all devices across all maps, and click the Notifier View I could set up the notifiers that way. Unfortunately, when I tried to check off the notifier boxes, it would not work. The Notifier List view in the DEVICE LIST window appears to be read only. Is this a bug, or was it just designed this way? This would be very useful I believe. Does any else have a work-around? Thanks!
<<image001.gif>>
