Hi, Diogo That's right. I could be useful with classes as well.
I was thinking about 'function' or 'func'. 'function' is more semantic, but 'func' is used with "short functions"( PHP 7.4 ) and these will be used for callbacks. Then I think 'func' will be more consistent. Thanks, Diogo, On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 12:51, Diogo Galvao <diog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:14 AM Manuel Canga <manuelca...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi internals, > > I Would like to present a possible new "::func resolution" for your > > consideration. > ... > > use function \My\I18N\i18n_translate; > > > > $mapped_array = array_map(i18n_translate::func, $array); > ... > > What is your opinion ? Do you see it useful ? > > I've wished for this on many occasions and think it'd be really useful, as > long > as it could work with methods as well: > > $mapped_array = array_map(I18N::translate::function, $array); > > For what it's worth I guess it could just return [I18N::class, 'translate']. > > Also for keeping consistency and avoiding new keywords wouldn't it fit better > as > ::function instead of ::func? > > > Best regards. > Diogo -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
