Hi, Diogo

That's right. I could be useful with classes as well.

I was thinking about 'function' or 'func'. 'function' is more
semantic, but 'func' is used with "short functions"( PHP 7.4 ) and
these will be used for callbacks. Then I think 'func' will be more
consistent.

Thanks, Diogo,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 12:51, Diogo Galvao <diog...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:14 AM Manuel Canga <manuelca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi internals,
> > I Would like to present a possible new "::func resolution" for your
> > consideration.
> ...
> > use function \My\I18N\i18n_translate;
> >
> > $mapped_array = array_map(i18n_translate::func, $array);
> ...
> > What is your opinion ? Do you see it useful ?
>
> I've wished for this on many occasions and think it'd be really useful, as 
> long
> as it could work with methods as well:
>
> $mapped_array = array_map(I18N::translate::function, $array);
>
> For what it's worth I guess it could just return [I18N::class, 'translate'].
>
> Also for keeping consistency and avoiding new keywords wouldn't it fit better 
> as
> ::function instead of ::func?
>
>
> Best regards.
> Diogo

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to